Hopkins vs Froch, who wins?

[KingTito]

Hard to say. I don't want to bet against Hopkins, but Froch might be too busy for him. The only thing I know for sure is it would have to be at 175.

[Bushbaby]

You're not gonna stop Froch from fighting at this point of his career. He isn't gonna wait on my main guy Hop. If Froch fights for 3 minutes of every round, which he's fully capable of doing, it's all bad for my guy Hop.

[SCtrojansbaby]

Doesn't matter the weight Froch is just much too strong at this point in B-Hop's career

[razor.thin]

froch would knock old popkins out

[Jloro]

I wouldn't want to see this fight. Froch would probably win by overwhelming him.I would love to be proved wrong but I think Froch would be too active for a 48 year old Hopkins. But it's always possible for BHOP to pull through. Either way I like them both but this fight shouldn't happen this late

[nachorjj]

Honestly, Froch wins this one, it's not even a hard fight to pick. Hopkins looked good but he didn't look nearly as good as he did against Pascal in the rematch. At this point Froch, Hopkins is my dude, not one to bet against him but he doesn't win this.

this, 2 years ago I go with Hopkins

[PrinceNaz88]

Froch always proves people wrong. Froch via decision.

[prinzemanspopa]

People are seriously, seriously overrating Froch.Hopkins, even at this stage, is far too intelligent and far too crafty for a guy with such glaring flaws in his game.Froch is as slow as a slug, has little to no defense, and is exceptionally mediocre at fighting on the front-foot and actually forcing the fight - and that's exactly where Hopkins would capitalize on his mistakes.


And two more points:


* Froch does not fight "for 3 minutes of every round."
* Froch was not even remotely competitive against Ward.

[BafanaBafana]

At 175 I got Hopkins by UD. Never bet against Hopkins, especially against a guy who's never tasted the waters at 175.

[BafanaBafana]

People are seriously, seriously overrating Froch.Hopkins, even at this stage, is far too intelligent and far too crafty for a guy with such glaring flaws in his game.Froch is as slow as a slug, has little to no defense, and is exceptionally mediocre at fighting on the front-foot and actually forcing the fight - and that's exactly where Hopkins would capitalize on his mistakes.


And two more points:


* Froch does not fight "for 3 minutes of every round."
* Froch was not even remotely competitive against Ward.

This guy know what he's talking about. Hopkins UD.