Originally posted by hectari
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dan Rafeal Tweets Canelo may not fight on Floyd Undercard after all
Collapse
-
Originally posted by DLT View Postthis is bad. Ive said all along that I disagree with everyone about Floyd-Ghost. I still think that fight will sell big on its own. People act like Canelo has always been on Floyd's card. Ghost is a Mexican, who looks white, speaks well, has great credentials, and people will eat up the story about his wifes battle with cancer. Not to mention the black vs whit thing. That will sell big.
The problem is now that everyone thought Canelo-Trout would be the undercard. Its better to have nothing at all then to have and then have lost. Meaning that if they never talked about it being on the undercard then I think the fight still wouldve sold well but this will make people so upset that they could lose some buys.
As for the Floyd-Canelo thing, I can see Floyd being very interested in a Canelo fight but not wanting to commit to it. Floyd is probably figuring that he's the biggest star in boxing so why would he have to commit to someone. He may fight him but they will decide that after. Not predetermine stuff. That kinda stuff is hard to workout. Right now I see Canelo fighting Trout on a separate card which is bad for business all around. Might make the Floyd-Ghost tix cheaper & easier to get though
who do you think is watchin all these fights by black boxers? only blacks?!? there might be some boxing fans who still see things like you said but for the most the black vs white rivalry in boxing is a thing of the past. especially when your "white" guy is a mexican, an ethnicity who is heavily discriminated by "real" whites.
i mean we have 2 heavyweight champions, whiter than guerrero on a cold december day beating black fighters on the regular and whites dont give a *****, c'mon dude, honestly...
Comment
-
Originally posted by onechance87 View PostThey will pay to see if canelo is the real deal. Just like fans supported
chavez jr with his fight against martinez.
You need two to tango, and Austin Trout is not popular. Adrien Broner is more popular than Austin Trout and he hasn't even fought a fighter as popular as Miguel Cotto. Trout even with beating Cotto is still pretty unknown. I mean people who know about Mayweather, Pacquiao, Broner, Cotto, Canelo, I ask them about Austin Trout and they say they don't know who that is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Light_Speed View PostCanelo is ****** to make demands at this stage of his career when negotiating with the biggest star in the sport. If he fights on the undercard and wins, it would create massive demand for a Floyd fight and it would most likely happen next.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -vincenzo- View Postcould you give us an example of this whole white vs black thing in boxing from the recent past? this aint the 1915 and jack johnson stopped boxing a long time ago...
who do you think is watchin all these fights by black boxers? only blacks?!? there might be some boxing fans who still see things like you said but for the most the black vs white rivalry in boxing is a thing of the past. especially when your "white" guy is a mexican, an ethnicity who is heavily discriminated by "real" whites.
i mean we have 2 heavyweight champions, whiter than guerrero on a cold december day beating black fighters on the regular and whites dont give a *****, c'mon dude, honestly...
Comment
-
I can understand Canelo's stance. It's in the back of his mind that if there is no agreement in place, then in theory he could beat Trout and still not get the Mayweather fight.
Thing is, if he doesn't fight on the May 4th card Mayweather may not look at him at his next opponent after Guerrero?
Maybe he would be best to take on Trout on May 4th first and see what happens then, who knows..as i said though, i can see his stance as he brings alot to the May 4th card.
I just hope the Canelo vs Trout fight goes ahead regardless of the date. As its one im looking forward to.
Comment
-
Comment