Originally posted by Russian Crushin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whats is YOUR interpretation of Ring Generalship?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostSo what does this have to do with what I said~ yea punching is the object of the game.
You should not score even rounds, as it is not that hard to find something to separate the men based on the rules of scoring.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxfan1983 View PostI can see how people say whoever contols the pace of the fight BUT what about high volume pressure fighters? For instance guys like Paul Williams and Antonio Margarito would throw well over 100 punches every round but could easily lose a decision to a pot shotter. IMO if a guy is getting off over 100 punches (¬ hitting air) that could be considered controling the pace, thats why the rules of judging are so outdated...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Russian Crushin View PostIf you believe a round is even you should score it even. Yea it isnt hard to find something if you look for it.
As a judge you are suppose to be watching close as hell seeing everything possible, so you should be able to find something to pick between.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PBP View PostLike I said, there are 4 criteria for a reason. If it was that simple, clean/effective punching would be the only criteria for scoring.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostThat's why ring generalship doesn't matter nearly as much as who is landing the best punches. Criteria like ring generalship is vastly overvalued by some posters.
Ring generalship is just as important as having power or speed..Believe me,if your landing the better punches,your most likely winning the ring generalship battle as well..Which in short,ring generalship goes hand in hand with everything else...
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View PostAs a judge your goal is to decide a winner, even rounds are a last resort sort of deal. IF you do it rarely it is not terrible, if you are doing it a lot you aren't a judge.
As a judge you are suppose to be watching close as hell seeing everything possible, so you should be able to find something to pick between.
Its easy to pick any thing to give a fighter a round. At that point its gonna be whatever bias you have. IF you like aggression, youll give it for that o ring generalship, then youll give it for that
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostI'm kinda surprise that you say ring generalship does not matter nearly as much as who is landing the best punch..I know you to be a very knowledgeable boxing fan..Ring generalship is what's getting you into position to hit ya opponent in the first place..
Ring generalship is just as important as having power or speed..Believe me,if your landing the better punches,your most likely winning the ring generalship battle as well..Which in short,ring generalship goes hand in hand with everything else...
Comment
Comment