Wladimir Klitschko vs. Bryant Jennings

[Elroy1]

Jennings does not have the size or the skills to compete with Wladimir.

He is a great athlete and solid boxer, no fault of Jennings.

Jennings has no punchers chance whatsoever against Wlad, not enough power.

Jennings has almost no chance to survive unless he is there to survive from first second to last (and even then it's a stretch), he doesn't have the kind of chin imo.

Klitschko KO2-4 Jennings (4 if he carries him), no punchers chance for Jennings at all with Klitschko winning every round to that point and barely even getting hit at all in the process.

Just a house keeping fight for Wlad really.

[thebigkabosh]

Great opponent for Klit:

Completely green. Check

No Power. Check

Smaller. Check

[Elroy1]

He's the same height as Muhammed Ali and Larry Holmes and has a much longer reach.

Jennings is taller than Sonny Liston and has the same long reach.

He's taller than Joe Louis and Evander Holyfield and has a longer reach.

He's has a MUCH longer reach and is MUCH taller than Patterson, Langford, Tyson, Marciano, and Dempsey.

Jennings has never weighed less than 218 and recently has weighed about 225, even though he's always ripped and in great shape.

HE'S NOT A CRUISERWEIGHT.

Yes it's ironic.. "Oh he's too small"..

Yet he is monstrously larger than any prehistoric opponent they pick to beat WK in every fantasy match, AND vastly more ripped and athletic too.

Go figure!

Never less than 218lbs, the same weight as Foreman in the Ali fight, the strongest of them

[thebigkabosh]

Yes it's ironic.. "Oh he's too small"..

Yet he is monstrously larger than any prehistoric opponent they pick to beat WK in every fantasy match, AND vastly more ripped and athletic too.

Go figure!

Never less than 218lbs, the same weight as Foreman in the Ali fight, the strongest of them

Being smaller is not a disadvantage by itself(in many cases it can be an advantage). Some of the best fighters of the "superheavyweight" Klitschko era were former MWs, LHWs and CWs. When a fighter lacks power, skill and athleticism and overall talent like an Alex Leapai(who you humorously declared would KO Ali) or this guy he is going to fight then it plays into the hands of the opponent.

Strange to compare this guy with Foreman. Foreman would destroy him with the quickness. It might take Grabby several rounds of humping before this opponent gets exhausted enough that he can put him down.

[Elroy1]

Being smaller is not a disadvantage by itself(in many cases it can be an advantage). Some of the best fighters of the "superheavyweight" Klitschko era were former MWs, LHWs and CWs. When a fighter lacks power, skill and athleticism and overall talent like an Alex Leapai(who you humorously declared would KO Ali) or this guy he is going to fight then it plays into the hands of the opponent.

Strange to compare this guy with Foreman. Foreman would destroy him with the quickness. It might take Grabby several rounds of humping before this opponent gets exhausted enough that he can put him down.

There was no humour about it. Leapai would KO Ali, no doubt about it. I posted 2 highlight reels of the pressure fighters LEapai and Frazier side to side and Leapai is leagues better visually, as well as record wise. Now only a simpleton can't decode that if Ali lost to and struggled with Frazier, he has little chances with Leapai!

Geroge Foreman lost to Jimmy Young! A bummy record, featherfisted cruiser, I don't think he will be running through Jennings. In fact I think it's safe to say Jennings would be the best opponent Foreman ever faced and the strongest by FAR considering only 70's George.

As for your Jennings assessment, I think he'd hit harder and could take a harder shot than 90+% of all pre 80's HW's. Is more skilled and athletic than nearly all of them too, and is much larger than any!

S which is it?

You just handle the fact that a 1 sided, risk free destruction of Jennings alone would be greater achievement than any of your old favourites accomplished in their entire careers

[$Bullsfam$]

There was no humour about it. Leapai would KO Ali, no doubt about it. I posted 2 highlight reels of the pressure fighters LEapai and Frazier side to side and Leapai is leagues better visually, as well as record wise. Now only a simpleton can't decode that if Ali lost to and struggled with Frazier, he has little chances with Leapai!

Geroge Foreman lost to Jimmy Young! A bummy record, featherfisted cruiser, I don't think he will be running through Jennings. In fact I think it's safe to say Jennings would be the best opponent Foreman ever faced and the strongest by FAR considering only 70's George.

As for your Jennings assessment, I think he'd hit harder and could take a harder shot than 90+% of all pre 80's HW's. Is more skilled and athletic than nearly all of them too, and is much larger than any!

S which is it?

You just handle the fact that a 1 sided, risk free destruction of Jennings alone would be greater achievement than any of your old favourites accomplished in their entire careers

Jesus Christ your ******ed.

[$Bullsfam$]

I want Jennings to do well but I just haven't seen enough to think he could beat Wlad. That last fight really didn't help as if the other guy was in better shape he could of won. Jennings is a decent fighter but still too green. He would of been better off fighting Chisora, Arreola or even Stiverne now that he lost. They would tell us where he is.

I think it's another ugly unanimous decision for Wlad. Even though Jennings has little one punch power Wlad will still hug **** him.

[thebigkabosh]

He's the same height as Muhammed Ali and Larry Holmes and has a much longer reach.

Jennings is taller than Sonny Liston and has the same long reach.

He's taller than Joe Louis and Evander Holyfield and has a longer reach.

He's has a MUCH longer reach and is MUCH taller than Patterson, Langford, Tyson, Marciano, and Dempsey.

Jennings has never weighed less than 218 and recently has weighed about 225, even though he's always ripped and in great shape.

HE'S NOT A CRUISERWEIGHT.

Yes but he is much worse than all of the fighters you mentioned.

[removed]

There was no humour about it. Leapai would KO Ali, no doubt about it.

[Elroy1]

Yes but he is much worse than all of the fighters you mentioned.

Oh yeah, how so???

I mean, please enlighten us how he is worse than them?

And don't try and lie.

What aspect of Jennings is inferior?

I have a stunning insight for you..

Let's suppose Bryant Jennings fought in the Louis era or the Ali era and not out current one.

And let's suppose he was a Louis opponent or an Ali opponent.

We don't have to even imagine Bryant beating Ali or Louis.. Let's suppose THEY won (a large stretch of the imagination for me that one).

What do you think you'd be saying about Bryant Jennings today??

You would be singing the praises of Jennings as being such a mountainous opponent with the highest athleticism and out of this world skills that no modern boxer could ever hold a candle to.

And he would be a PROOF of the superiority of the Ali and Louis eras which featured superior boxers. And of the greatness of Ali and Louis for having beaten such a magnificent opponent as Jennings.

Fact!