Depends on who you think was the better fighter. Quintana had the good win over Paul Williams afterwards, Vargas had the win over Quartey (though he was inactive) prior.
I think the Vargas that fought Trinidad would win every round from Cotto and KO Cotto within 6 rounds. Vargas would only need a round or two to KO Quintana in my opinion. Trinidad and Vargas were two of the best ever at 154 and a class above Cotto. Vargas was never as good after the Trinidad fight but he was a monster going into that fight. I think Vargas would have defeated De La Hoya if he had fought him before he fought Trinidad.
so some random alt says some ******ed **** and you actually waste your time making a thread about it??
Larry, i decided to canvass opinion with an interest in ascertaining whether the collective boxing IQ of the forum is passable on the most basic level. i was wondering how many here might be as delusional as that fellow. from the poll result, it seems we could be a lot worse off here at NSB.
then, on the other hand, there are the threads you make. the ones that almost certainly make first-time visitors question the collective IQ of the forum. you make lots of them. and they're all about "******ed ****" (either yours or others peoples'). calm yourself down, homie.
Larry, i decided to canvass opinion with an interest in ascertaining whether the collective boxing IQ of the forum is passable on the most basic level. i was wondering how many here might be as delusional as that fellow. from the poll result, it seems we could be a lot worse off here at NSB.
then, on the other hand, there are the threads you make. the ones that almost certainly make first-time visitors question the collective IQ of the forum. you make lots of them. and they're all about "******ed ****" (either yours or others peoples'). calm yourself down, homie.
why would they blame others for me being ******ed??expecaily when they read my threads and see most people calling me ******ed?
Comment