Better win, Tito TKO12 Vargas or Cotto RTD5 Quintana?

[UrDazed]

Depends on who you think was the better fighter. Quintana had the good win over Paul Williams afterwards, Vargas had the win over Quartey (though he was inactive) prior.

It's a good question.

[S. Saddler 1310]

I think the Vargas that fought Trinidad would win every round from Cotto and KO Cotto within 6 rounds. Vargas would only need a round or two to KO Quintana in my opinion. Trinidad and Vargas were two of the best ever at 154 and a class above Cotto. Vargas was never as good after the Trinidad fight but he was a monster going into that fight. I think Vargas would have defeated De La Hoya if he had fought him before he fought Trinidad.

i agree with everything, more or less.

[S. Saddler 1310]

Depends on who you think was the better fighter.

i think most would agree that there should be little debate over who was better and more accomplished.

[IronDanHamza]

Obviously Tito-Vargas.

It's not debatable, at all.

[Rip Chudd]

Of course Vargas. Who the heck thinks otherwise?

Edit: Took the split second of me posting for it to pop into my head. Must be a Cotto fan.

[Larry the boss]

why is this even a question?

[S. Saddler 1310]

gentlemen, meet thatdudespits, http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/member.php?u=190200, the fellow who believes that a win over Quintana is equivalent to a win over Vargas.

[Larry the boss]

gentlemen, meet thatdudespits, http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/member.php?u=190200, the fellow who believes that a win over Quintana is equivalent to a win over Vargas.

so some random alt says some ******ed **** and you actually waste your time making a thread about it??

[S. Saddler 1310]

so some random alt says some ******ed **** and you actually waste your time making a thread about it??

Larry, i decided to canvass opinion with an interest in ascertaining whether the collective boxing IQ of the forum is passable on the most basic level. i was wondering how many here might be as delusional as that fellow. from the poll result, it seems we could be a lot worse off here at NSB.

then, on the other hand, there are the threads you make. the ones that almost certainly make first-time visitors question the collective IQ of the forum. you make lots of them. and they're all about "******ed ****" (either yours or others peoples'). calm yourself down, homie.

[Larry the boss]

Larry, i decided to canvass opinion with an interest in ascertaining whether the collective boxing IQ of the forum is passable on the most basic level. i was wondering how many here might be as delusional as that fellow. from the poll result, it seems we could be a lot worse off here at NSB.

then, on the other hand, there are the threads you make. the ones that almost certainly make first-time visitors question the collective IQ of the forum. you make lots of them. and they're all about "******ed ****" (either yours or others peoples'). calm yourself down, homie.

why would they blame others for me being ******ed??expecaily when they read my threads and see most people calling me ******ed?