No. I was basically getting at what had Margarito done to become career defining win for Floyd??? I think Margarito would have been a solid win at that time, a good one. I think Guerrero would be too. Alexander, I don't know. I think it's an okay win. But nothing more really.
Who Has the Better Wins at Welterweight: Devon Alexander or Robert Guerrero?
Collapse
-
And he still would have beaten the Maidana that fought Alexander. Guerrero wasn't a great fight either, but it's better than Alexander. Because Maidana and Bailey are more recognizable names than Aydin, they're automatically better? I'm looking at their form the night they fought Alexander, which is what is being asked, not name recognition. Bailey was one of the worst WW champs in recent times, Aydin could have beaten him too. Alexander's WW resume is shit.Originally posted by McAlisterok and the berto that fought robert wasnt the same berto, came out tryna fight like broner... we can sit here and make excuses on both ends
at the end of the day maidana and bailey are better names to have on ya resume than aydin? wtf and bertoComment
-
Because Berto almost got knocked out by 2 Jr welterweights Ortiz and Collazo. Lil do people remember the Berto who picked on junior welterweights as WW champ.Originally posted by hougigoHow can anybody say Alexander has a better resume?
He has one win against a JWW and another against a guy who throws like 5 punches a round
Maidana is Ortizs daddy and would beat collazo. Maidana on his best night is the wrong Jr welterweight to mess with. Devon just caught him on his worse night ever.
And if Bailey lands people go the phuuck nite nite. Again I don't know what the hell was wrong with him throwing 6 punches a round when a KO was his only shot.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for AndroidComment
-
-
Not really Devon has a lot of bigger names on his resume than Robert does. Out of the two Devon has fought the bigger guys.Comment
Comment