It doesn't matter Sergio is the king now, these other scrubs need to fight each other and quit begging for scraps.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Quillin gives more excuses not to fight Golovkin
Collapse
-
Originally posted by kiaba360 View PostEither all fighters agree to each other, or all fighters try to build their name value up and do what's best for themselves. You're right, the quickest way for them to build themselves is to fight one another, but most fighters don't like the risk:reward ratio. So, they'll go the route of fighting contenders. Chavez did it and it eventually got him a shot at THE guy. Quillin's resume is so weak that Rubio would indeed be a step-up. It's a guy that he'll most likely beat the hell up and get something nice to show on the highlight reel. My opinion of Quillin will change for the worse if he doesn't fight someone in his tier this year. Like you said, he's in his prime years now, he shouldn't waste them on guys who won't force him to improve his game.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by elijahlyric View PostSo Glovokin's resume is better? Hussein and Winky are better than the Rosados, Proska, and oumas. Glovokin is in his prime, he's been a pro since 2006, and in 2012 to present he's ready to step up. Oh and He's 30-31, it seems GGG waited until Pavlik, Taylor, & Abraham left the division and wasn't on top. Glovokin deserves criticism too for his lack of competition and just now stepping up, after being a pro for 7years and counting . With over 300 amateur fights
Comment
-
Originally posted by elijahlyric View PostSo Glovokin's resume is better? Hussein and Winky are better than the Rosados, Proska, and oumas. Glovokin is in his prime, he's been a pro since 2006, and in 2012 to present he's ready to step up. Oh and He's 30-31, it seems GGG waited until Pavlik, Taylor, & Abraham left the division and wasn't on top. Glovokin deserves criticism too for his lack of competition and just now stepping up, after being a pro for 7years and counting . With over 300 amateur fights
Golovkin was also set to fight Pirog but Pirog injured himself and pulled out. GGG also tried to fight Ndam with no luck.
So how can you criticize Golovkin? Its not his fault these guys didn't fight him.
Further Golovkin is 30. Quillin is 29. Lets not act like Quillin is some young kid he's basically the same damn age.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elijahlyric View PostSo Glovokin's resume is better? Hussein and Winky are better than the Rosados, Proska, and oumas. Glovokin is in his prime, he's been a pro since 2006, and in 2012 to present he's ready to step up. Oh and He's 30-31, it seems GGG waited until Pavlik, Taylor, & Abraham left the division and wasn't on top. Glovokin deserves criticism too for his lack of competition and just now stepping up, after being a pro for 7years and counting . With over 300 amateur fights
GGG just got his name on the map in 2011, so it seems unrealistic that a guy in his position would've gotten fights with Taylor/Abraham/Pavlik at that time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostWhat about Peter talking about Geale? He said he wants Martinez the most, ok everyone does, but he goes on to say, incorrectly, that he doesn't want to go after the regular WBA champion in Golovkin. He said if no Martinez then he would want to fight the Super Champion in Geale. The thing is Geale is no longer a WBA champion, he was stripped of that title which now belongs solely to Golovkin. Shouldn't that mean Quillin would want Golovkin?? That was his entire logic.
I don't support "ducking," but the business aspect of the sport is something we're forced to live with in the real world. Practically all these guys have their vested interests in mind, regardless of what they say. As Chris Rock might put it, "I don't agree, but I understand."
Comment
-
Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC View PostQuillin also mentions, correctly, that Geale is the IBF champion. I don't see a problem with Pete fighting Dan over GGG, although I'd prefer the latter. As I've said before, if Quillin takes on Golovkin within a reasonable time-frame, it's all good.
I don't support "ducking," but the business aspect of the sport is something we're forced to live with in the real world. Practically all these guys have their vested interests in mind, regardless of what they say. As Chris Rock might put it, "I don't agree, but I understand."
__________________Last edited by ИATAS; 01-26-2013, 02:30 PM.
Comment
Comment