Think about it, Bradley is a fantastic little fighter.
Good offense, Good defense, rarely drops a round, good inside game, fast, also headbutts lol, strong. Just a very good all round fighter with no noticable flaws.
Resume wise
Ward
Kessler-Abraham-Froch-Dawson
Bradley
Witter-Holt-Petersen-Alexander
Edge to ward, but Bradleys isn't too shabby and he dominated them all too.
To compare Bradley and Ward is asinine. Ward's game is highly multifaceted. Bradley's only strong points are his pressure and conditioning.
Before Bradley faced an ATG in Manny Pacquiao, he was concensus top 7 P4P, and highly rated.
Since he "lost" to a guy who is levels above anyone Ward has ever fought the opinion of him has gone way down, obviously the Ward crew don't want to compare him to a guy who just "lost"
Take pacquiao out of the equation (I think Ward would be done in a simmilar style if he faced a young RJJ for instance) and I don't think there is a massive gap as many are making out.
Bradley is quite well rounded as a fighter. Not like Ward but how many fighters are? Bradley has pressured and boxed at a high level and dominated.
Sure, he has been competing at a high level and has won. However, I disagree to an extreme degree about him being a "well-rounded" fighter. Bradley wins based on pressure alone. His opponents typically wilt, which leads to their downfall.
Sure, he has been competing at a high level and has won. However, I disagree to an extreme degree about him being a "well-rounded" fighter. Bradley wins based on pressure alone. His opponents typically wilt, which leads to their downfall.
What would you say are Bradleys flaws, if he's not a well rounded fighter?
Comment