Originally posted by richardt
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Marquez Denies Fifth Pacquiao Fight, No Decision Yet
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by richardt View PostBut I hold JMM in higher regard than Pac and Floyd for the simple reason that he fought BOTH Pac and Floyd when niether Pac nor Floyd would fight each other and BOTH those guys made excuses for not fighting each other. JMM can retire some day knowing he fought both guys when all they had were excuses for not fighting each other. That makes JMM pretty damn special because NO ONE can say he ever ducked a fighter. He fought BOTH.
2. Pac never made no excuses to not fight floyd and gave JMM 3 rematches
3. JMM ducked Morales
4. Get your facts straight
Comment
-
Originally posted by ElBossHogg™ View PostMarquez the GREAT!
Hey Boss
that punch from marquez to pac on your second signature was a couple of seconds after gettin up of the matt right ?
But the ref blocked the shot. thx for the angle bro ! where did u got it from ?
that was a hard punch , the proof that pac was gettin too wild when he connected marquez, something he didnt do in the third one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jr2122 View PostAnd exactly where do you think the "numbers" come from? Buyers. And if you think pacquiao generates those numbers alone, than your off base. The only fight where he did it alone was against clottey and statistically that fight did not do so well. And as for Marquez, after this kind of victory, he's gonna generate big numbersLast edited by richardt; 12-30-2012, 01:21 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post1. JMM has a losing record against both
2. Pac never made no excuses to not fight floyd and gave JMM 3 rematches
3. JMM ducked Morales.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post1. JMM has a losing record against both
2. Pac never made no excuses to not fight floyd and gave JMM 3 rematches
3. JMM ducked Morales
4. Get your facts straight
2. The fact of the matter is they didn't fight; blame it on the two big egos, Snake Arum, not wanting to take the test... what have you, but the fact is they didn't fight.
3. Marquez was ducked by both Barrera an Morales early in his career so he payed him back with the same coin.
4. Get your head outta pacman's you know what...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chicago_Brown View PostI knew it was only a matter of time before someone, particularly a blind JMM fan in denial, would point fingers in another direction. Stick to the subject at hand my friend. Besides didn't I say, to be equal, that NEITHER participated in random drug testing. And no the "Rat" didn't file a lawsuit against Conte. So stop with the false rumors. If I was cheating I probably would aim lower than another expert who just rightfully defend his suspicions and potentially expose me. The only reason Freddie "backed off" was for the mere fact that he didn't want to be sued. Win or loss it still cost money and time. He's not interested in losing either. That doesn't mean, his justifiable, suspicions have changed even remotely.
BTW- Who are the two athletes of Conte's that were under his services when they tested positive? I'll give you the answer before do the homework that you obviously didn't do before you made that asinine ill-informed statement -NONE-. If you start to open your mouth and say Berto please plant your foot in it simultaneously because Conte was not involved with that camp at all. Do you even know what Berto tested positive for? No. I didn't think so.
FYI- Conte actually works hand in hand with VADA the one and ONLY organization that is near fool proof with their testing. So yes the reformed man has a lot of room to talk on a subject that he's a lot more educated than you and I put together.
Lastly who cares what self serving Ariza has to say about anything. Manny is not educated on PEDs nor their use and is too classy to make an accusation that he's not certain of. It's just not his style. On the other hand I'll take it from the perspective of an expect (Conte) any day. I may not have 20/20 vision but I can see the obvious when it's staring me right in the face. Can you?.... SMH
As far as Heredia's lawsuit against Conte, that's not something I simply made up. It was reported on boxingscene. I'm unaware of the current status of that suit, which is why I said "supposedly" rather than stated it as fact.
As far as Berto is concerned, he was indeed a client of Conte's. He had previously provided guidance with Berto's training regimen and was providing him with supplements during his training camp. Now, Conte has speculated that Berto may have ingested the banned substance from outside sources, but the fact remains that he did test positive and he was associated with Conte at the time.
Given Roach's reputation for talking out of his ass, I'm really not surprised that he's now backing off of those accusations. He had previously implied that Marquez refused to submit to their request for additional testing, which has since been denied by his promoter. In the past, team Pacquiao dismissed the need for additional testing and stressed the importance of allowing the commission to do their job. Well, they did their job and Marquez's results came back negative. So it's now time for Roach to pucker up.Last edited by Caxcan; 12-30-2012, 01:41 AM.
Comment
Comment