floyd beat cotto, trout beat cotto

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • studentofthegam
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 4127
    • 114
    • 107
    • 4,433

    #41
    Originally posted by PiXelElite
    Again... floyd would not take on a fighter who is a threat to his 0... classic floyd move to wait a year & decide very carefully who to fight next.
    WHAT THE ****? So now he's ducking Trout? Whew. You mu***as are relentless with it. He's ducking Ward, GGG, and Tyson Fury too for that matter.

    Comment

    • BafanaBafana
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2012
      • 1662
      • 53
      • 40
      • 7,860

      #42
      Originally posted by studentofthegam
      WHAT THE ****? So now he's ducking Trout? Whew. You mu***as are relentless with it. He's ducking Ward, GGG, and Tyson Fury too for that matter.
      Why yes, he should fight Trout? Wouldn't you love to see that fight? I sure would.

      Or would you rather he fight the clearly undeserving Canelo?

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30064
        • 2,142
        • 811
        • 105,596

        #43
        Originally posted by El Gallo Negro!
        That's weird. I though he fought Cotto "at his best weight, 154"
        Originally posted by El Gallo Negro!
        I could have swore I seen a thread where Floyd takes on the best in every division he's in.
        Originally posted by -Kev-
        Floyd takes on the #1 guy in every division he's in, he did that with Cotto. Floyd is the #1 guy in 2 separate divisions. He IS the best, he can't fight himself. He has to wait to see who comes out on top from the younglings[or oldies], then he fights the winner like a true boss.

        The next best fighter at 154 is Canelo. I think Canelo handles Trout if they fight on May 4th. Everyone will see that the best fight was Mayweather vs Canelo all along.
        Floyds a charity case, fights people at their best divisions?
        So i guess JMm was in his best division, as was Hatton? Cottos best division may well have been 154, but he didnt all of a sudden become superman there. He won most of his proper fights at 147. Just cos Miguel felth healthiest at 154 dont stop the fact he was won most of his meaningful fights at 147 and was messed up by Pac first and wasnt the same at 154
        Last edited by hugh grant; 12-28-2012, 03:33 AM.

        Comment

        • KING MEAT
          Dorian's Protege
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 14902
          • 844
          • 279
          • 185,196

          #44
          this has got to be the dumbest thread ive seen this week.

          Comment

          • ROSS CALIFORNIA
            Tyson fan
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 69864
            • 997
            • 1,956
            • 113,453

            #45
            Originally posted by El Gallo Negro!
            So why is Floyd-trout not happening again?

            No need for anyone to come up or down. Both have titles. Both undefeated. Arum is not involved. Trout would take three dollars and any phony test.

            So what's the holdup?
            Low risk, high reward. Trout is none of that.

            Comment

            • Marvellous1
              Undisputed Champion
              • May 2010
              • 1265
              • 91
              • 0
              • 7,415

              #46
              I wouldn't mind seeing this fight. But as people well know, if this fight went ahead next, there would be no end of threads about Mayweather ducking Martinez and Canelo to fight Trout. It's a good if unspectacular fight but a legitimate challenge.

              However, if it doesn't happen anytime soon, you could hardley call it a duck. If Mayweather continued to campaign at the weight, and both had a couple more wins, THEN it didn't happen, I would call it a duck. Right now, A Trout fight is as arbitrary as another.

              Comment

              • Marvellous1
                Undisputed Champion
                • May 2010
                • 1265
                • 91
                • 0
                • 7,415

                #47
                Originally posted by hugh grant
                Floyds a charity case, fights people at their best divisions?
                So i guess JMm was in his best division, as was Hatton? Cottos best division may well have been 154, but he didnt all of a sudden become superman there. He won most of his proper fights at 147. Just cos Miguel felth healthiest at 154 dont stop the fact he was won most of his meaningful fights at 147 and was messed up by Pac first and wasnt the same at 154
                If all this is true, then explain why Pacquiao wouldn't fight him at the weight. Explain why he needed a catchweight- AGAIN (We know you can't/won't).

                Or you could just give your opinion on a Mayweather/Trout match. Is it a "must see" match right now? Is it more sellable than a Mayweather/Canelo match? What are the implications? Go on, Hughey. Try being a boxing fan for once.

                Comment

                • BafanaBafana
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2012
                  • 1662
                  • 53
                  • 40
                  • 7,860

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Marvellous1
                  I wouldn't mind seeing this fight. But as people well know, if this fight went ahead next, there would be no end of threads about Mayweather ducking Martinez and Canelo to fight Trout. It's a good if unspectacular fight but a legitimate challenge.

                  However, if it doesn't happen anytime soon, you could hardley call it a duck. If Mayweather continued to campaign at the weight, and both had a couple more wins, THEN it didn't happen, I would call it a duck. Right now, A Trout fight is as arbitrary as another.
                  The only guys who wanna see Mayweather fight Canelo are Floyd groupies and Oscar himself. Canelo doesn't deserve a shot he hasn't fought anyone.

                  Comment

                  • happyman
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 681
                    • 41
                    • 81
                    • 6,918

                    #49
                    I'd like to see this fight, don't think floyd would fight him though.

                    Comment

                    • ROSS CALIFORNIA
                      Tyson fan
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 69864
                      • 997
                      • 1,956
                      • 113,453

                      #50
                      Originally posted by BafanaBafana
                      Why yes, he should fight Trout? Wouldn't you love to see that fight? I sure would.

                      Or would you rather he fight the clearly undeserving Canelo?
                      A fight with a puncher like Canelo would be much more exciting than a fight with Trout. If Trout wins, its by out boxing Mayweather with his reach and height. If Canelo wins, its because he beat the hell out of Mayweather.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP