Comments Thread For: Adamek Rips Robbery Claim: He Ran, This Was Sparring!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jdubb863
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 1543
    • 37
    • 0
    • 7,980

    #11
    Lol adamek did the same thing agianst arreola... he also looked fat and slow like arreola too

    Comment

    • Drunken Cat
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Sep 2003
      • 14547
      • 916
      • 1,272
      • 30,630

      #12
      I'm going to need to watch this fight.

      Having not yet watched it, there is a question which pops into my head, is there any potential that commentators tend to be somewhat biased in favor of the American style of boxing and against the Eastern European style? I've watched many of Adamek's fights, and the guy is not flashy, but he gets the job done. Sometimes it isn't the volume of punches, but the effect of the punches, and Adamek's punches tend to have an effect on his opponents.

      I'm just asking a question. I'll watch the fight when I can get my hands on it.

      Comment

      • southpaw_07
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2008
        • 5140
        • 281
        • 264
        • 18,490

        #13
        let Steve "boil" down another 3 lbs and rematch Marco Huck...I would guess that the result will be different this time..Steve running for his life...

        Comment

        • RapidFire26
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Sep 2011
          • 414
          • 9
          • 0
          • 6,460

          #14
          Originally posted by Nodogoshi
          I'm going to need to watch this fight.

          Having not yet watched it, there is a question which pops into my head, is there any potential that commentators tend to be somewhat biased in favor of the American style of boxing and against the Eastern European style? I've watched many of Adamek's fights, and the guy is not flashy, but he gets the job done. Sometimes it isn't the volume of punches, but the effect of the punches, and Adamek's punches tend to have an effect on his opponents.

          I'm just asking a question. I'll watch the fight when I can get my hands on it.
          Cunningham never looked like he was in serious danger despite the fact Adamek had a heavy weight advantage.

          Cunningham also showed better pop then I thought he would. Adamek definitely felt some of those punches (not that he was in serious danger either).

          Comment

          • crold1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 6349
            • 326
            • 122
            • 19,304

            #15
            Originally posted by Nodogoshi
            I'm going to need to watch this fight.

            Having not yet watched it, there is a question which pops into my head, is there any potential that commentators tend to be somewhat biased in favor of the American style of boxing and against the Eastern European style? I've watched many of Adamek's fights, and the guy is not flashy, but he gets the job done. Sometimes it isn't the volume of punches, but the effect of the punches, and Adamek's punches tend to have an effect on his opponents.

            I'm just asking a question. I'll watch the fight when I can get my hands on it.
            I actually thought the announcers were giving WAY too much credit to Adamek. Cunningham appeared to win 4 or 5 of the first six rounds and they were calling it even. My theory is that Adamek was getting points for toughness for continuing to walk in straight lines and get hit while rallying mildly late in some rounds.

            Comment

            • Frank Ducketts
              Floyd's jizz
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 10021
              • 291
              • 67
              • 16,378

              #16
              Originally posted by Nodogoshi
              I'm going to need to watch this fight.

              Having not yet watched it, there is a question which pops into my head, is there any potential that commentators tend to be somewhat biased in favor of the American style of boxing and against the Eastern European style? I've watched many of Adamek's fights, and the guy is not flashy, but he gets the job done. Sometimes it isn't the volume of punches, but the effect of the punches, and Adamek's punches tend to have an effect on his opponents.

              I'm just asking a question. I'll watch the fight when I can get my hands on it.
              You're asking the wrong question here buddy!

              Comment

              • MJ223
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2011
                • 4740
                • 686
                • 706
                • 12,520

                #17
                Originally posted by Nodogoshi
                I'm going to need to watch this fight.

                Having not yet watched it, there is a question which pops into my head, is there any potential that commentators tend to be somewhat biased in favor of the American style of boxing and against the Eastern European style? I've watched many of Adamek's fights, and the guy is not flashy, but he gets the job done. Sometimes it isn't the volume of punches, but the effect of the punches, and Adamek's punches tend to have an effect on his opponents.

                I'm just asking a question. I'll watch the fight when I can get my hands on it.
                Not imo..... They actually had it a lot closer then some of the other scores I have seen which were mostly 9-3/8-4 with a few 7-5's sprinkled in for Cunningham.... I scored it 9-3 Cunningham

                Comment

                • Drunken Cat
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 14547
                  • 916
                  • 1,272
                  • 30,630

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Frank Ducketts
                  You're asking the wrong question here buddy!
                  Like I said I haven't watched yet, I'm just asking a question. It is a pretty general question about boxing, just trying to garner some opinions.

                  Comment

                  • AlbertoDelRio
                    Banned
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 17
                    • 9
                    • 5
                    • 54

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Shadow boxer 3
                    umm no, Cunningham gave u the business and u looked fat tonight

                    haha your right Cunningham outboxed Adamek's fatass

                    Comment

                    • Drunken Cat
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 14547
                      • 916
                      • 1,272
                      • 30,630

                      #20
                      Originally posted by crold1
                      I actually thought the announcers were giving WAY too much credit to Adamek. Cunningham appeared to win 4 or 5 of the first six rounds and they were calling it even. My theory is that Adamek was getting points for toughness for continuing to walk in straight lines and get hit while rallying mildly late in some rounds.
                      Originally posted by MJ223
                      Not imo..... They actually had it a lot closer then some of the other scores I have seen which were mostly 9-3/8-4 with a few 7-5's sprinkled in for Cunningham.... I scored it 9-3 Cunningham
                      Good answers.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP