Originally posted by tracylee
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Teddy Atlas on Wlad
Collapse
-
Originally posted by NeuraxisHow could you possibly not be hating. This just in you gave rounds to guy who ran away the whole fight. Talk about insane.
Judges scores: 49-46 (K)
48-47 (W)..must hate him; and I gave it a draw
49-46 (K)
Considering that I'm not the only one that gave Williamson the runner (it's called "using the ring" and "stick and move") a round or two, they MUST hate him too, right?
AND, he MUST have 'run into' Wlad, therefore causing the knockdown, right? (the only knockdown)
Hate? NO,it's called scoring objectively; you should try it some time. If I hated him like you keep saying, why the draw? Why give Wlad any round's at all? ESPECIALLY considering that one of the judges had Wlad LOSING.
Bet you had it a complete shut out, right?
My scores: 47-47....DRAW
Compared to the judges, I wasnt too far off the mark (or too full of hate)
I thought that D.W. did enough to win the last 2 rounds; had knocked Wlad down, AND Wlad looked exhausted and was breathing through his open mouth (can get your jaw broken that way, ya know?) ALL of which makes me think that he MAY have been lucky to have it stopped when it was.
Hate?....No, FACTS!
But, since you claim to know what's in my head so much, and why I do the thing's that I do, etc.. please tell me what I'm going to cook for dinner; cause as of yet I'm undecided.
Debating with objective Klitschko fans is fine; debating with you is redundant.
Comment
-
Actually I think every single writer in press row had it 48-46. The one judge obviously hates Wlad. That is an interesting scoring system you have though. Its great. Let's award rounds to someone who runs away and gets tagged with punches in a 4:1 ratio. Its brilliant.Last edited by Neuraxis; 10-03-2004, 02:25 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NeuraxisActually I think every single writer in press row had it 48-46. The one judge obviously hates Wlad. There is no way Williamson won.I'll debate with an objective fan; that counts you out and you definately just proved it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tracyleeBut of course; all of us that didnt think he won convincingly, or worship at the church of Klitschko HATE him...press row? Was that REALLY the best you could do? Like I said, redundant. No fact's..just a biased reply.I'll debate with an objective fan; that counts you out and you definately just proved it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NeuraxisActually I think every single writer in press row had it 48-46.
To me it looks as if Wlad is on the way out, Brewster is garbage, and Sanders can **** a bit but Wlad really has been exposed the last couple of years, it looks as if those whiskers aren't made of the right stuff and strange how he never had a huge stamina problem before, oh apart from when he was KO'd in the 11th in his first loss
Comment
-
Originally posted by theirononeCan you confirm this please.
To me it looks as if Wlad is on the way out, Brewster is garbage, and Sanders can **** a bit but Wlad really has been exposed the last couple of years, it looks as if those whiskers aren't made of the right stuff and strange how he never had a huge stamina problem before, oh apart from when he was KO'd in the 11th in his first loss
Comment
-
I feel there is no way Wladimir lost the fight or that it was a draw yesterday. Which round did Wladimir get outboxed? It should have been unanimous decision. Wladimir earned his win yesterday, it was not given to him. Wladimir did not fight his best. Yet he still beat a good fighter who had a good night, a top 15 fighter with a big punch. Williamson is very tall and quick, with long arms. Williamson is better than Brewster and Ruiz. I would love to see Williamson fight Toney. How would Toney fair? Wladimir showed great heart when he came back very quickly in the same round. Wladimir showed great stamina too.
Comment
Comment