Should Abril-Broner Be For The Ring Championship

[-PBP-]

You are seriously going to put The Ring belt, that many consider to be the Lineage and very similar to it, on the line when #4 fights #5? What a joke.

No it's either:

#1 vs. 2,3,4 or 5

#2 vs. 1,3,4 or 5

[Kagami Taiga]

No it's either:

#1 vs. 2,3,4 or 5

#2 vs. 1,3,4 or 5

That's pathetic.

[-PBP-]

That's pathetic.

The Canelo rule

[kiaba360]

Honestly, imthink the top 4 lightweights are Broner, burns, Vasquez and abril. Broner appears to be the best but he doesn't have the best resume at the weight. The picture is to cloudy among those 4 fighters for me to say any one fight between them should be for the ring.

This. Broner/Abril and Burns/Vasquez, winners fight each other for the Ring title. If it were only this easy.

[Russian Crushin]

No it shouldnt. But Garcia-Khan was for a Ring title so it probably will be

[IronDanHamza]

No it's either:

#1 vs. 2,3,4 or 5

#2 vs. 1,3,4 or 5

#2 Vs. #5 is just as bad.

[Outwest Exp 355]

#2 Vs. #5 is just as bad.

If the contenders worthy. I dont have a problem with it in this circumstance. Broners already number 1 and this would be his second win against a top 5 guy. Plus his earlier victory was against the best LW out there. Broner shouldnt be punished especially since his camp tried to make the Vasquez fight. Abril is a worthy contender and worthy of wearing the belt if he wins.

[boliodogs]

No. April is #5. He needs to beat #2 Miguel Vazquez to be the Ring Champion.

[4Corners]

Abril should be higher than number 5 anyway, so I don't have too big a problem with it.

[MJ223]

Interesting..... Poll is pretty much split