Marquez has never tested positive so what's the big deal?
NYTimes openly su****ious of PED use by JMM
Collapse
-
Heredia was already carrying Marquez water bucket in Pac vs JMM 3 fight. No wonder he looked good in that fight but Heredia fruit of labor we just saw in the last fight.At the end of the day, it doesn't matter what the NY Times writes, doesn't matter what Yahoo writes, etc. It's crying over already spilled milk. Damage has already been done. And Marquez's physique this time around is not significantly different from the third fight. Where were these writers back then? Marquez looked beastly for the third fight too.
But again, what's done is done. Maybe next time, for Pacquaio's next fight, these writers and all the complainers will demand BEFOREHAND that Pacquaio and his opponent undergo random drug testing for his next fight.Last edited by boxer.exposed; 12-10-2012, 02:50 AM.Comment
-
Yea, this is all true. Not every fight can have vada testing, but A LOT can. At the very least, every big fight should have mandatory vada testing, but the commissions can do this only if GB and TR are on board. The commission can't do anything because they're all competing with each other, and they don't care. Hell, even GB and TR don't care, and I wonder how much the fans even care.there will never be testing like vada or usada implemented by a commission because 1) the cost is too high 2) the commissions most likely couldn't care less if a fighter is juicing, as it would make for more exciting fights
if they truly cared about PED's, the penalties would be MUCH harsher. fact is, they really don't care as much about it as say loaded gloves
And yes the penalties should be much harsher, if they want to deter cheaters. Where is the Lamount Peterson ban? Its crazy that congressional inquires have been launched over PED use in baseball and cycling, but when it comes to the sport where PED use is truly dangerous, boxing, they're silent.
I think its only the fighters that care, but Manny isn't one of them. Well he paid for his simplistic, philosophical outlook. He didn't even care when Bradley was awarded the decision.Comment
-
-
JMM has always been an experimental boxer, as the NYtimes pointed out with him drinking his own piss.
So, if they're not going to sufficiently test him, why wouldn't he experiment with juicing? The whole reason for him juicing is because he knows he will not test positive with the pathetic tests the comissions do, and he's got an expert drugs test evader too.
The NYtimes is a gatekeeper for what is taboo and acceptable for a lot of people in America, regardless of what you guys think. The fact they're questioning his win, the fact they're implying JMM used PEDs, means so are millions of people all over the world. JMM never looked like this when he was young, never had this power when he was young. But at almost 40, hes a body builder, with unquestionably more power than before?Comment
-
Where was the NYTimes when Manny got ripped and was knocking mofos out?
NyTimes hates Blacks and Browns! I bet the writer is a fat yank who married a Filipina (through mail) and now he thinks he's half Pinoy.
I hope Marquez sues NYTImes for this!Comment
-
Straight from the horse mouth. Even the Olympic test is useless to Heredia's ****tails.
For years, Mr. Heredia said, he helped his clients flout the rules and easily avoided detection. Substances like human growth hormone and the blood booster erythropoietin, or EPO, are still virtually impossible to detect, and "it is still easy to use testosterone" with fast-acting creams, he said.
"You combine all these things -boom! - you get amazing results," Mr. Heredia said.Comment
Comment