Comments Thread For: Broner vs. Burns in The Mix For February Showdown

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAW
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2010
    • 116
    • 3
    • 0
    • 190

    #21
    Originally posted by El Angel
    Can't hate on Broner's comp at LW so far. Fighting the best. He'll handle Burns, Gamboa is the only one who can challenge him at 135.
    Agreed here. Burns showing why Wbo is a joke though. Really, a title defense against Ocampo? Someone please tell me there's some back story I'm unaware of that can excuse this travesty.

    Comment

    • SkillspayBills
      Garlic Butter Gang!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 29181
      • 2,155
      • 3,739
      • 61,188

      #22
      Another good win on Broner's resume and a title to boot. Then Vazquez/Gesta winner before moving up.

      Comment

      • Red Power
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Sep 2012
        • 209
        • 52
        • 6
        • 6,198

        #23
        Why would Burns take this fight when he came milk his title in the UK for years? I can't see him getting an exorbitant amount of money vs. Broner, so I don't see any reason why he won't duck him like he did at 130.

        Comment

        • Enzo Mc is SHIT
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 3947
          • 167
          • 1
          • 17,498

          #24
          Just staying busy, I think. He fights much more often than some.

          Would love to see him beat Broner but realistically he gets pummelled.

          Comment

          • catalinul
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 6581
            • 115
            • 49
            • 13,580

            #25
            Originally posted by JAW
            Agreed here. Burns showing why Wbo is a joke though. Really, a title defense against Ocampo? Someone please tell me there's some back story I'm unaware of that can excuse this travesty.
            His original opponent got injured.

            Comment

            • nysoxfan84
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jan 2012
              • 243
              • 8
              • 0
              • 6,316

              #26
              Who holds the IBF and WBA title? After Burns, Broner should clean house by going after those titles or fight Gamboa, and then move up.

              Comment

              • -Kev-
                this is boxing
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2006
                • 39950
                • 5,038
                • 1,449
                • 234,543

                #27
                Originally posted by Julious_cesar
                havent seen much of burns but hes only got 10 kos from his 35 wins broner would walk through him.
                He's no Paulie Malignaggi though, he has pop. He stopped Mitchell in 4 rounds, he also stopped Nicky Cook. Gave Roman his only loss, beat Moses and Katsidis. Burns has the best resume from any fighter Broner has fought. He will definitely be the best fighter in Broner's resume if he can win.

                Comment

                • -Kev-
                  this is boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 39950
                  • 5,038
                  • 1,449
                  • 234,543

                  #28
                  Originally posted by SkillspayBills
                  Another good win on Broner's resume and a title to boot. Then Vazquez/Gesta winner before moving up.
                  I don't know man, I want him to move up after Burns. The Gesta/Vazquez winner ain't all that, and they're Top Rank aren't they? GBP/Top Rank won't negotiate for such an unimportant fight. If Broner beats Burns, he becomes the 135 Ring champion and can just vacate and move up. 135 sucks. DeMarco and Burns were the only fighters I wanted to see Broner fight, because they're the best there. Looks like Broner is giving me just that. I will be pleased with just those two fights. The really good fights are at 140.

                  Comment

                  • kiaba360
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 19000
                    • 2,271
                    • 3,441
                    • 45,265

                    #29
                    Had the Abril/Bogere fight not have fallen through, that could've been Broner's last fight at the weight after Burns.

                    Comment

                    • UglyPug
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 9561
                      • 403
                      • 159
                      • 13,951

                      #30
                      Originally posted by nysoxfan84
                      Who holds the IBF and WBA title? After Burns, Broner should clean house by going after those titles or fight Gamboa, and then move up.

                      IBF title is Vazquez (it's being fought for tomorrow night; Gesta has a chance to win off Vazquez, but I personally think unless some funny business happens, Vazquez will outbox Gesta).

                      WBA title is still "open," or vacant. The last fight for it was Rios/Abril, and since Rios failed to make weight, he did not maintain the title - he was stripped before hte fight, and only Abril was fighting for it. I believe Abril might be the mandatory, guaranteed to fight for it next. The WBA granted him this status after the Rios figt, despite losing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP