Don't Undestand The logic Of Trout Critics

[The_Sandman]

Trout defeated Cotto. Trout doesn't need to fight Canelo. It's Canelo that needs to fight Trout.

[KickAzz]

People jump all over canelo for not fighting cotto, because to be the best at 154 you have to beat cotto, then when Trout defeats cotto he isn't considered the best. He has to now fight Canelo, who was criticized for not fighting cotto, the so called best. WTF? If trout has to fight canelo then that makes canelo the best, and if Canelo is the best in the division, then he is not to inexperienced to fight floyd in 2013.

basically you want gingerboy vs floyd, but you got a round about way of getting there.

cotto would be a major step up for gingerboy, but seeing the results of last weekend, it's plain to see that cotto is too small at 154 and doesn't really belong there.

cotto is not the gatekeeper at 154 lbs, but in anycase, trout doesn't have to fight gingerboy, gingerboy has to fight trout cause trout was the one who beat cotto.

the best at 154 lbs is sergio martinez, never forget that... martinez would beat the living dogshiot outta gingerboy.

[junior gong]

Trout has been quietly going about his business. He isnt exactly electrifying to watch, but he is effective. He won his title and defended it away and keeps winning. He deserves respect.

[thuggery]

The Trout fans are emerging