Comments Thread For: Schaefer: Canelo vs. Cotto Bout is Still Possible
Collapse
-
Trout is a stylistic nightmare for CaneloComment
-
I wouldn't watch Cotto vs Canelo, I wouldn't want my last image of Cotto being beaten from post to post by the younger Canelo, thus ending his career as a stepping stone.
Cotto has no business fighting at 154, he should go down to WW, make a fight against an OK opponent and retire.Comment
-
-
Cotto has no business fighting Canelo unless he wants to totally get his ass handed to him. I don't care for Canelo, but I wouldn't mind seeing that fight just to see another Mexican fighter destroy a Borriqua. The rivalry will never never stop so why not have Canelo destroy and retire Cotto.Comment
-
Yeah, because fighting Mosley/Hatton/Lopez is the equivalent to fighting Trout? Destroying small/old/faded fighters automatically means he walks through a prime true LMW without any issues? Give me a fuckin break.Comment
-
Very, very good post. And so true. Cotto is a huge draw. So is Canelo. That fight would still be huge on Cinco De Mayo weekend. Besides, did anybody think last night while Schaefer was consoling Cotto that this fight would really be off the table? I sure didn't.I like the idea that Cotto is still in the running to face Alvarez.
I think Trout was a ballsy pick for Cotto. He took a high risk fight that not a lot of other top fighters would have touched (no WAY would Golden Boy match Canelo with Trout). He shouldn't be punished for taking a really tough fight and coming up short.
If Cotto's multimillion dollar payday is thrown away because he took a risky fight and lost, it helps reinforce the current precedent, and we won't get to see fights like Cotto-Trout.Comment
Comment