Originally posted by OnePunch
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Schaefer: Canelo vs. Cotto Bout is Still Possible
Collapse
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostIf it makes every one feel better, how about Cotto gets a win over Bundrage or Molina, and then we have Canelo vs Cotto on September?
I mean I don't know who the hell Canelo will fight in May, probably Trout. Mayweather vs Guerrero seems like it's going to happen.
Comment
-
I wouldn't watch Cotto vs Canelo, I wouldn't want my last image of Cotto being beaten from post to post by the younger Canelo, thus ending his career as a stepping stone.
Cotto has no business fighting at 154, he should go down to WW, make a fight against an OK opponent and retire.
Comment
-
-
Cotto has no business fighting Canelo unless he wants to totally get his ass handed to him. I don't care for Canelo, but I wouldn't mind seeing that fight just to see another Mexican fighter destroy a Borriqua. The rivalry will never never stop so why not have Canelo destroy and retire Cotto.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mic573 View PostGolden boy is looking at it from a business point of view. Cotto will bring in more money then Trout would ever dream of.
Either way Canelo would destroy both.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Southpaw16 View PostI like the idea that Cotto is still in the running to face Alvarez.
I think Trout was a ballsy pick for Cotto. He took a high risk fight that not a lot of other top fighters would have touched (no WAY would Golden Boy match Canelo with Trout). He shouldn't be punished for taking a really tough fight and coming up short.
If Cotto's multimillion dollar payday is thrown away because he took a risky fight and lost, it helps reinforce the current precedent, and we won't get to see fights like Cotto-Trout.
Comment
Comment