Comments Thread For: Austin Trout Shocks Miguel Cotto With Lopsided Win

[sdcluser]

not shocked at all. knew this was gonna be a tough fight. have been saying Cotto is overrated at this weight, too.

[paulf]

Anyone else find it hilarious that Malignaggi had Cotto ahead on his card until the last round or so? I thought he really knew how to score em, but apparently not. Either that or he felt scoring it for Trout would knock him down a notch, I mean seeing a guy who thoroughly beat him having his socks boxed off.

Paulie is usually good at calling fights, but he's always big upped Cotto, probably because he looked good and won a lot of fans in that defeat.

Paulie once said that Cotto was really undefeated, because both the guys he lost to (Marg and Pac) were cheating when they fought.

[JAW]

Trout had a much easier time beating Cotto than Floyd did just show's how Floyd only fights has beens

****ing ****** biased comment. Mayweather is so much smaller than Trout and older than Cotto.

[turnedup]

Paulie is usually good at calling fights, but he's always big upped Cotto, probably because he looked good and won a lot of fans in that defeat.

Paulie once said that Cotto was really undefeated, because both the guys he lost to (Marg and Pac) were cheating when they fought.

I would put 20k on the line to to watch Paulie get in a ring with Pacquaio..that would be like watching a chihuahua get mauled by a pitbull.

[Cuban Linx]

I think it's safe to say Martinez would have killed Cotto if they ever fought.

[PUK_MY_DANG_34]

He was pulling for Cotto as was the other announcer..they were announcing shots we clearly saw cotto missed as landed shots..after the 6th round I had to mute them..folks here complain about Lampley and the others on HBO but damn if Showtime's team isn't flat out horrible and the 99cent versions of announcers.

You mean that ball f**ker who also does commentary for Strikeforce? That guy doesn't have any business scoring boxing matches either, in my opinion.

Thanks for the your opinion, no one at my house talks boxing. It's nice to hear what other people think.

I think the old 30's-50's radio broadcasters were a hell of a lot better than what we have now. Those guys could paint a perfect picture of the fights, without all the bulls**t network bias we have to listen to now, and they didn't even need video to do it.

[gquezvas]

Yep.

I had Trout winning.

But the scores on Cotto's on turf?

Kinda shocked.

Anyways, no meal ticket for you Canelo, lol.

Why bring up Canelo only? Mayweather has a belt there also

[JAW]

I think it's safe to say Martinez would have killed Cotto if they ever fought.

He would ring Cottos bell all night.

[g.goodman25]

Good job Trout

Austin Trout easily won 8-12 Cotto alright he never been that hall of fame fighter.

[googol]

I think it's safe to say Martinez would have killed Cotto if they ever fought.

yeah he has 193 reach while trout 183 while Cotto only 170... wow