Originally posted by Bozo_no no
Shouldn't Byrd look to avenge his loss to Wlad (period)? Throw some criticism at Byrd for dodging Wlad this year, instead of piling it all on Wlad, who took on the most dangerous puncher in the division (Peter)- a guy NObody wanted to face. Now, nobody wants to fight Wlad.
Brewster has said he only wants unifications. That's a fact. So wouldn't it make sense for Wlad to go after Byrd again, in order to get a belt, and THEN he could get a fight with Brewster to attempt to avenge his loss?
Yes, he's #1 contender for Brewster, but should Wlad sit around for a year until Brewster is forced to fight his mandatory, unification or not?
It actually looks like Wlad will need the IBF and WBO to enforce his mandatory, because neither Brewster or Byrd seem to be looking at him as their next opponent, and Wlad has a date set with HBO already I believe.
Just one of the reasons why boxing is a frustrating sport to be a fan of. Fighters like Byrd squat on their belts, and fighters like Wlad are avoided, even after fighting their way into #1 contender position. I predicted this immediately after the fight, that after seeing him go 12 full rounds and take punishment from a puncher like Peter and win fairly easily that NOBODY was going to be interested in fighting him. Wlad is going to have to wait for the IBF to threaten Byrd with stripping him by a certain date to get a fight with him, and EVEN THEN I'm not sure if Byrd will fight him.
As for Brewster, he is obviously eyeing Valuev, if you read between the lines. Brewster has no problem fighting in Germany, and I'm sure he would make a nice payday in a unification with Valuev over there. And fighting Wlad is WAY more of a risk than fighting Valuev. If I were Brewster, I'd do the same thing. But from a fan's perspective, it's still frustrating.
Comment