Originally posted by IMDAZED
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How can people say Calzaghe has a better resume than Froch?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by pigsfly View Posti don't think so............obviously the better the opponents the higher risk for a loss.
froch consistently fights top ter guys. i think that adds to the resume............
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostOnly if he beat them. When looking for work, do you list all the wonderful jobs you applied for but didn't get on your resume? I didn't think so.
dude.
if i fight ali, fraizer, foreman, lewis, tyson, holmes. & i beat 3 of the 5. (but lose to 2) the other 2 are still worth mentioning because it shows i fought everyone (the best of my era) it shows the consistency of my career.
if i beat 1 of those guys & have a undefeated record (with no one worth mentioning) it's a weaker resume.Last edited by Godsfly; 11-17-2012, 10:07 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pigsfly View Postdude.
if i fight ali, fraizer, foreman, lewis, tyson, holmes. & i beat 3 of the 5. the other 2 are still worth mentioning because it shows i fought everyone (the best of my era)
if i beat 1 of those guys & have a undefeated record (with no one worth mentioning) it's a weaker resume.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostTrue - because you beat three legends out of five. Not quite what happened here. Here...his best win is over Jean Pascal. And he lost every round to the best opponent he fought (Ward) and looked completely out of his league.
anyway i must run to broner vs darmarco.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostTrue - because you beat three legends out of five. Not quite what happened here. Here...his best win is over Jean Pascal. And he lost every round to the best opponent he fought (Ward) and looked completely out of his league.
Taylor+Johnson+Ward+Dirrell+Kessler+Pascal+Bute+Ab raham is already no doubt head and shoulders above Calzaghes resume, Frochs got 175 run where he can beat Dawson imo if hes as good as he is at 168, hes also got a list of rematches that include Kessler, Ward, Dirrell, Bute before he leaves the division. Theres no doubt Frochs resume is in a completely different class to Calzaghe.
You can't have a resume completely and solely built off of beating via Split decision a 43year old hopkins(which many think he lost) and fighting 20+tomato cans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shinobi108 View PostHis best win was Dirrell whos gonna show hes up there with the elite of elites in the future. Froch beat Kessler in my opinion even with all the crazy crap that happened to him during the week of the fight he still beat him and couldve stopped him in the 5th.
Taylor+Johnson+Ward+Dirrell+Kessler+Pascal+Bute+Ab raham is already no doubt head and shoulders above Calzaghes resume, Frochs got 175 run where he can beat Dawson imo if hes as good as he is at 168, hes also got a list of rematches that include Kessler, Ward, Dirrell, Bute before he leaves the division. Theres no doubt Frochs resume is in a completely different class to Calzaghe.
You can't have a resume completely and solely built off of beating via Split decision a 43year old hopkins(which many think he lost) and fighting 20+tomato cans.
Comment
Comment