Referee Joe Cortez Submits Proposition To Improve Judging During Fights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fighting_Pride
    Pure Aggression
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2012
    • 1779
    • 99
    • 30
    • 8,326

    #1

    Referee Joe Cortez Submits Proposition To Improve Judging During Fights

    there have been numerous cases where boxing fans have felt some fights determined by decision were scored unfairly and victories gone the wrong way seemingly rigged by incompetent judges.

    pro boxing referee joe cortez has made a study on how to remedy this and has concluded that the best way is for judges sit a few feet behind their current positions but on eight-foot stools, with their heads about three feet higher than those of the fighters. You might compare it to a chair umpire in tennis, as cortez put it in layman terms. the judges theoretically would have a better view of the action because obstacles – the ropes, the ref, sometimes bright lights – would no longer be a factor. being elevated up there, all by yourself, there are no distractions whatsoever.

    this in my opinion is a bunch of horse shit. it not only blocks the view of paying customers behind the judges but also does not underline the main problem, which is human error, nobody's perfect after all.

    what i suggest is for judges to watch the fight on a tv monitor which is gives the best view during actual fights as well as adding compubox chips within the boxers' gloves to get an accurate reading of the punches thrown every minute of every round.

    here is photo of the stool cortez was proposing to add by ringside.



    your thoughts or suggestions?
  • Juof
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 3590
    • 94
    • 273
    • 10,490

    #2
    What if David Hayes compubox chip malfunctioned and it showed him throwing more than 10 punches a round

    Comment

    • negged
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2012
      • 135
      • 23
      • 10
      • 260

      #3
      i was about to talk a lot of **** but then i saw this



      other than blocking the crowd, that's not too bad of an idea. but singling out a judge could be dangerous too. i can't take anything joe cortez says seriously anyway

      Comment

      • Fighting_Pride
        Pure Aggression
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2012
        • 1779
        • 99
        • 30
        • 8,326

        #4
        Originally posted by jamiegeorge91
        What if David Hayes compubox chip malfunctioned and it showed him throwing more than 10 punches a round
        good point, i guess that's where the judges competence come in. hopefully they still get it right

        Comment

        • Capaedia
          JMM Stan
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2011
          • 2847
          • 185
          • 396
          • 9,501

          #5
          Death sentence for bad judging.

          Failing that, stricter penalties for bad judging.

          Ideally they would review the fight by video from two different angles and compare them. But that would make the decision take much longer to announce and some people may not like that.

          But personally I would prefer that to some fighter working his heart out not only in the fight, but the training camps also, only to get all his effort and sacrifice voided by a judge who sneezed during an important punch.

          Comment

          • Check_hooks
            The Don of NSB
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 12099
            • 966
            • 1,875
            • 25,959

            #6
            I like the idea

            F*** the fans in the rich seats, the boxers should come first

            Also if you judge a fight that 90% or above of the media and public think you got wrong than not only do you not get paid for judging that fight but you are banned for life (those two old idiots that scored Pac vs Bradley)

            Comment

            • controlmachete
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 661
              • 52
              • 6
              • 6,921

              #7
              I think something like this: Watching the fight in a cubicle on a monitor with no sound, sometimes they get carried away with the noise of the crowd, slow motion replays of knock downs or cuts only, no highlights like hbo does, ...

              Somebody thinks this would work?

              Comment

              • Daddy T
                BigDaddy
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 5637
                • 198
                • 156
                • 12,260

                #8
                Originally posted by jamiegeorge91
                What if David Hayes compubox chip malfunctioned and it showed him throwing more than 10 punches a round
                you must have missed his last fight but anyway they simply need to bring in peer reviewing panels any remotely controversial or simply **** cards are put before a panel of say the worlds top 100 judges and if the judge in question is agreed to be more than an acceptable degree off the consesus he is banned from judging/ has his pay witheld, the problem at the moment is there is no accountability - a judge could fall asleep for 12 rounds, proceed to pull a scorecard out of his ass and get away with it.
                Last edited by Daddy T; 11-05-2012, 06:20 AM.

                Comment

                • Fighting_Pride
                  Pure Aggression
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2012
                  • 1779
                  • 99
                  • 30
                  • 8,326

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Capaedia
                  Death sentence for bad judging.

                  Failing that, stricter penalties for bad judging.

                  Ideally they would review the fight by video from two different angles and compare them. But that would make the decision take much longer to announce and some people may not like that.

                  But personally I would prefer that to some fighter working his heart out not only in the fight, but the training camps also, only to get all his effort and sacrifice voided by a judge who sneezed during an important punch.
                  funny but true, i wonder what happens if one of the judges needs to take a leak though lol

                  Comment

                  • AntonTheMeh
                    STOP CRYIN
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 21222
                    • 700
                    • 709
                    • 31,623

                    #10
                    yeah, we've heard of this a couple of weeks ago. i think its a good idea.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP