Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao: I Believe Mayweather is Avoiding Me

[BoxingGenius27]

Marquez was/is the Lightweight you JACK ASS! You don't even understand anything. Floyd out classed JMM and is a better counter puncher/boxer than him and that's why he beats Manny. Who the hell do you think I was talking about? Man, you are pathetic.

So let me understand this.

It clearly shows what you said in my sig. The sig doesn't lie; but since you got called out, now you're trying to tell us what you "meant" to say. Then, all of a sudden I'm supposed to "Know what you mean" even though that's clearly what you DID NOT say, but yet when I do try to read in between the lines like I did with Richardson you say "I'm putting words in people's mouth".

So which is it; make up your mind lol

Am I suppose to "know what you mean", but not know what "Richardson means"?

Which is it, ******?

[Bullrider]

So none of what I said in my post never happened? You already know that I will get all of the links and quotes to everything. Do you want to go there?

This guy avoided my simple question. I repeat, what would you do to make the fight happen if you were in Mayweather's shoes? Assuming you really want the fight. What would you do to make the fight happen?

[King Jaffe Joffer]

This guy avoided my simple question. I repeat, what would you do to make the fight happen if you were in Mayweather's shoes? Assuming you really want the fight. What would you do to make the fight happen?

Bury the hatchet with Arum

But Floyd makes 2x as much as Pac each fight.. Pac wants more than he deserves.. Pac made 6 million vs Mosley, Floyd made 30.. Do the math. Now Pac wants 65-35 would be fair, along with PPV 90-10 for Floyd as well..

[BoxingGenius27]

those are triangle theory posts. When you put "I think" and "off the top of my head" and compare Soto to Garcia when Soto has never fought at JWW prior to losing to Matthysse and putting Soto and Rios in the same boat? How can you predict how a fight would turn out against Garcia/Matthysse by the win over Soto? AND then you go on to say that Soto is capable of beating any of the top 140LB fighters? No one agrees with that. That's a theory that doesn't add up. I just don't get your outlook and that's the problem. You are steady getting on me about triangle theories but you already copped twice to what I was saying BUT you still continue to mock me. That's weak sauce.

Comparing a fighter based off "styles" is a triangle theory?

Damn, you are dumber than I thought; and that's pretty hard to do considering you're bottom of the barrel.

Oh yeah, when you see someone say "I think" or "Off the top of my head", that means in my opinion. See, for some reason, you have a problem differentiating with opinions vs facts. You post quotes that don't mean jack schit and try to pass them along as facts, when in reality it's all subjective at the end of the day.

Evaluating fights based off styles is subjective, but makes sense.

Evaluating fights based off triangle theories like you try to do is plain ******ed.

Go play around on google and educate yourself on stuff you should've learned in the 2nd grade (i.e opinions vs facts).

Boxing......27, So you are saying that the only way you can compare fighters and who will win is if they fought someone similar prior to facing each other? Seriously that is the dumbest thing I have EVER heard. Not everyone has the same style or similar you JACK ASS. When you compare fighters everything plays a factor in a match up EVERYTHING.

So you seriously compared Soto to Garcia because they're flat footed and like to slug? Garcia is a counter puncher with timing and he is at a higher weight, undefeated. This sounds ******. Garcia is clearly in a better position and fresher as a fighter than Soto. Soto lost his first time moving up and Garcia is at the top of the division Soto lost in. Not a good comparison.

I'm saying the bold is a million times better than your ****** ass triangle theories and going to boxrec and looking solely at a fighters wins and losses. Maybe actually seeing a fight and knowing a fighters habits against certain "styles" outweighs "this guy beat this guy who beat this guy = measuring stick".

This is elementary stuff here dummy.

Lastly, yes, Soto and Garcia is a good comparison in styles. In fact Soto just might be the better boxer. Either way, they both like to ****/counterpunch and go toe to toe. Look at Garcia-Morales I for starters then look at Soto's fights.

Oh wait, let me guess, you can't compare Soto to Garcia stylistically because Soto loss like 7 times before the year 2000 and only loss 2 times in the last 13 years, while Garcia is undefeated?

Do you guys see the ******edness I'm dealing with here in Grustler aka RUSTY?

Since Garcia is undefeated and Soto loss 7 or 8 times, they can't be compared stylistically?

Dumbass motherfckurs on boxingscene, I'll tell ya.

[BoxingGenius27]

This guy avoided my simple question. I repeat, what would you do to make the fight happen if you were in Mayweather's shoes? Assuming you really want the fight. What would you do to make the fight happen?

He's the master at avoiding questions. He's been doing it to me for weeks.

[tlarry]

Floyd JR Made Mosley & Cotto Wait More Than 10 Years! What's New?!!?

Mosley & Cotto were too dangerous earlier in their prime, so Mosley waited until he thought they were too old, had too many wars, careers were thought to be on the decline, or hopeful someone else beat them down, so Floyd didn't have to cross paths with them. He tried fighting the best of the best ONCE in their prime, Oscar Dela Hoya, and Junior got roughed up that night; most watching the fight, felt Oscar won that fight. Junior bit off more than he wanted that night, didn't like getting hit so much, and walked away from $25M for a rematch with Oscar. He nearly guessed wrong again fighting Mosley & Cotto when he did. Shane had him on ***** street nearly knocked out in Round 2, before letting him escape and Cotto bloodied his nose and drug him into a street fight he didn't want. He could have fought Marcos Maidana after he dismantled Victor Ortiz in 8 rounds, but Junior chose Ortiz (who lost), rather than Maidana (the winner). What puzzy does that?!!!? So don't be surprised Junior has made Pacquiao wait more than 4 years, as he realizes Pacquiao is still too dangerous. His excuse now is Manny lost to Bradley (the fix), yet that didn't hold true for Cotto. Junior Mayweather needs to grow a set!

[sammiza567]

Mosley & Cotto were too dangerous earlier in their prime, so Mosley waited until he thought they were too old, had too many wars, careers were thought to be on the decline, or hopeful someone else beat them down, so Floyd didn't have to cross paths with them. He tried fighting the best of the best ONCE in their prime, Oscar Dela Hoya, and Junior got roughed up that night; most watching the fight, felt Oscar won that fight. Junior bit off more than he wanted that night, didn't like getting hit so much, and walked away from $25M for a rematch with Oscar. He nearly guessed wrong again fighting Mosley & Cotto when he did. Shane had him on ***** street nearly knocked out in Round 2, before letting him escape and Cotto bloodied his nose and drug him into a street fight he didn't want. He could have fought Marcos Maidana after he dismantled Victor Ortiz in 8 rounds, but Junior chose Ortiz (who lost), rather than Maidana (the winner). What puzzy does that?!!!? So don't be surprised Junior has made Pacquiao wait more than 4 years, as he realizes Pacquiao is still too dangerous. His excuse now is Manny lost to Bradley (the fix), yet that didn't hold true for Cotto. Junior Mayweather needs to grow a set!

not sure if srs

[GRUSTLER]

Hey ******, what you forgot to show was Richardson saying how "Garcia won't have problems with Judah" before you posted the quote about Mathysse.

Why only post part of the full interview; but I have an agenda?

Secondly, why do you always dance around what he said about Judah?

You have no problem comprehending Richardson indirectly saying Garcia can beat Judah. But all of a sudden you run into problems comprehending what he says regarding Mathysse because it doesn't fit your agenda.

So again, why do you think Richardson shows so much confidence in Garcia over Judah, but lacks that same confidence when evaluating how the Garcia-Mathysse bout will play out??

Oh, I know why, nevermind. Because you still have on your "Garcia beat Khan who beat Judah who beat Mathysse" glasses? I almost forgot, that's inhibiting you to thank outside the box, but enabling you to see and interpret what you want to see and interpret. I think I'm on to the dummy now.

Oh damn.... You're right my bad. I didn't put that part of the interview in. Ok, lets touch on it. Richard said that Garcia will have no problems beating Judah but Matthysse did. What's your point? Styles make fights I bet. Even Richardson knows that Judah is easy work for Garcia and should have been for Matthysse since according to you.... Garcia is ducking him and he such a good fighter everyone at 140 is afraid of. I don't understand how hard it is for you to see that Richardson did not mean it how you said it. Richardson also said that Garcia is a little bit better skilled than Matthysse but you neglected to touch on that but rather went all the way out to left field to say that Richardson meant that Garcia can't beat Matthysse. It'sok for Richardson to feel like the fight is anyone fight because the story is told in the ring but you already got what he said figured out when he didn't even say what you said. Naazim is usually a very upfront and honest guy about his opinions so he doesn't need you telling everyone on Boxingscene what he meant.

[BoxingGenius27]

Oh damn.... You're right my bad. I didn't put that part of the interview in. Ok, lets touch on it. Richard said that Garcia will have no problems beating Judah but Matthysse did. What's your point? Styles make fights I bet. Even Richardson knows that Judah is easy work for Garcia and should have been for Matthysse since according to you.... Garcia is ducking him and he such a good fighter every at 140 is afraid of. I don't understand how hard it is for you to see that Richardson did not mean it how you said it. Richardson also said that Garcia is a little bit better skilled than Matthysse but you neglected to touch on that but rather went all the way out to left field to say that Richardson meant that Garcia can't beat Matthysse.

WHAT'S MY POINT???

After all this, you're asking what's my point?

Hey ******, my point is Richardson never "directly" said Garcia can beat Judah lol Thanks for falling for it.

He said "Garcia shouldn't have problems with Judah". Point is, you read in between the lines and knew how to interpret when just a few days ago you were saying "Don't put words in people's mouth if they don't directly say x, y and z".

So what do you do? Put words in Richardson's mouth and interpret he said Garcia should beat Judah, even though that contradicts your whole theory of "putting words in people's mouth". lol You just killed yourself.

[GRUSTLER]

Comparing a fighter based off "styles" is a triangle theory?

Damn, you are dumber than I thought; and that's pretty hard to do considering you're bottom of the barrel.

Oh yeah, when you see someone say "I think" or "Off the top of my head", that means in my opinion. See, for some reason, you have a problem differentiating with opinions vs facts. You post quotes that don't mean jack schit and try to pass them along as facts, when in reality it's all subjective at the end of the day.

Evaluating fights based off styles is subjective, but makes sense.

Evaluating fights based off triangle theories like you try to do is plain ******ed.

Go play around on google and educate yourself on stuff you should've learned in the 2nd grade (i.e opinions vs facts).




I'm saying the bold is a million times better than your ****** ass triangle theories and going to boxrec and looking solely at a fighters wins and losses. Maybe actually seeing a fight and knowing a fighters habits against certain "styles" outweighs "this guy beat this guy who beat this guy = measuring stick".

This is elementary stuff here dummy.

Lastly, yes, Soto and Garcia is a good comparison in styles. In fact Soto just might be the better boxer. Either way, they both like to ****/counterpunch and go toe to toe. Look at Garcia-Morales I for starters then look at Soto's fights.

Oh wait, let me guess, you can't compare Soto to Garcia stylistically because Soto loss like 7 times before the year 2000 and only loss 2 times in the last 13 years, while Garcia is undefeated?

Do you guys see the ******edness I'm dealing with here in Grustler aka RUSTY?

Since Garcia is undefeated and Soto loss 7 or 8 times, they can't be compared stylistically?

Dumbass motherfckurs on boxingscene, I'll tell ya.

you are a JACK ASS and no matter what you say I already proved that in every post. You talk in circles and twist things for you to make others seem like they do not understand. How can Soto be compared to Garcia when Soto is a 135 fighter and Garcia is at 140? Soto is older and Garcia is younger. How can you compare how a fight would be against Matthysse when Soto is not even on Garcia's level you DAMN JACK ASS.