Originally posted by Tomasio
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Khan Says Roach's Illness Was Partial Reason For Split
Collapse
-
-
Can't Khan ever just shut the hell up???
Why can't Khan keep his mouth shut?? Maybe when the English brit by way of the middle east big mouth wins a fight again and then maybe ever get a belt back then speak out. Till then Khan shut the hell up.
Comment
-
Amir khan doesnt need freddy roach as long as he keeps going the limey route drudging up no named south american midgets. Is khan fighting the same guy that kell brook just fought? they should have just had both of them kick the same guys ass on the same card, and save everybody the bother.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mikeMack View PostWhy can't Khan keep his mouth shut?? Maybe when the English brit by way of the middle east big mouth wins a fight again and then maybe ever get a belt back then speak out. Till then Khan shut the hell up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostYeah and that's why Khan has gone to a more defensive minded trainer. Roach is still a good trainer but only for certain styles of fighters.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NoLove View PostIn the past he has claimed he went to Freddie to improve his defense. The fact is he can't fight, never has been able to fight and never will be able to fight. It doesn't get any simpler.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostHe can fight very well. He has beaten some good fighters. The guy in your avatar got embarrassingly KOed 3 times only to change trainers and redefine his career so I don't know why you're suddenly acting like Khan is the first guy to change trainers.
Comment
-
-
Khan unfortunately still lacks the maturity to take responsibility for his own failings.That, rather than any perceived shortcomings of his trainers, has been the major detriment of his career.
That said, at no point in this article does he say that Roach's illness was a partial reason for the split. Edward Chaykovsky says that, not Khan. Now at a stretch, we could infer that from his answer, but not without knowing what question he was replying to.
The reply gives the impression that he's been asked a leading question; allowed himself to be led, and then retracted when he realised where his answer was going. Khan isn't responsible for the sensationalist headline. Nor is he responsible for irresponsible journalism.
Comment
Comment