whos better morrales or barrera

[Agave]

I say Barrera is the best out of them two!

You wont see Marco defending his title against fighters that have been inactive for more than three years and unranked 'ala' Eddie Croft!

their last fight was called 'once & for all'

[psychopath]

I say Barrera is the best out of them two!

You wont see Marco defending his title against fighters that have been inactive for more than three years and unranked 'ala' Eddie Croft!

their last fight was called 'once & for all'

Oh yes "once and for all" and yet MAB is leaning on fighting Morales again than giving a rematch to the guy who beat him up black and blue on.

Morales? Line them up, BUM, NOT BUM, anybody who presents themselves in front of him, he fights them all.

[.::|ULTIMATE|::.]

Styles make fights and while MAB may have beaten Erik in their trilogy, The fact is Erik has been the winner over not one but two fighters that MAB proved he could not beat and in fact got stopped by them.

I think in comparison Erik's resume is better and proves him as the slightly better fighter since he went through more elite fighters, and beat fighters MAB couldnt beat. MABs record ist nothing to snear at either though.

When it comes to the two against each other Erik style simply plays into MAB's.

[JOM'S]

At first I would have said outright the Erik is better than MAB, but as well explained by Ultimate, NOW I could not say it outright ...

but if ever there will be MAB-EM 4 I am betting all my point on Erik...

[adeelr]

they both hav their own qualities, in terms of success morales might have little more, barrera is more experienced. morales has never been kayod or even been closed to getting kayod, but barrera has 3 devastating kayo losses. So morales looks better on paper, but both are neck to neck fighters.

[TOPitBull]

they both hav their own qualities, in terms of success morales might have little more, bdevastating kayo losses. So morales looks better on paper, but both arearrera is more experienced. morales has never been kayod or even been closed to getting kayod, but barrera has 3 neck to neck fighters.

Morales, better on paper? I beg to differ. Zaheer Raheem, cough, cough.

I'd rather get Koed by Pacman anyday.

[moy22487]

those same fans that see the second fight shady will also say the same for the first fight. they each got a victory that should of gone to the other one but the 3rd fight was hands down mab fight. who is the better of the 2 who ever gets a fight with marquez. (MAB will beat pacman in a rematch and he would beet raheem)

[TOPitBull]

those same fans that see the second fight shady will also say the same for the first fight. they each got a victory that should of gone to the other one but the 3rd fight was hands down mab fight. who is the better of the 2 who ever gets a fight with marquez. (MAB will beat pacman in a rematch and he would beet raheem)

good point with marquez. No one will give him a shot so he won't move up. definitely a contender for the big three.

Probably won't be as exciting watching marquez because of his counter style.

But i'd still love to see it.

[psychopath]

Morales, better on paper? I beg to differ. Zaheer Raheem, cough, cough.

I'd rather get Koed by Pacman anyday.

Oh yes Erik was beaten by Raheem at 135. Eric's first fight at that division, a poorly prepared Erik at that And the reason why it didn't really blemished Eric's reputation is that he is fighting another formiable opponent immediately after that loss.

Contrary and unlike MAB who was completely dominated and humilated by a stepping up fighter in the person of Pacquiao, who later on claims to have had a bad night but doesn't want to fight him again. Take note, that was Pacquiao's first fight as a featherweight jumping three weight categories up.

In your honest opinion, which is worst buddy.

[guardian]

I think Morales is the Better boxer on the 2

I saw the Morales-Barrera 3 fight even. And I think it deserves a 4th match after PACMAN disposes Morales

And when that happen.... I'll bet for Morales