Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Naazim RICHARDSON: "I Don't Think Pacquiao Can Beat Marquez... JMM Won All 3"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by DTMB View Post
    when did i say that?

    stop assuming.
    WHEN YOU WERE OUT THROWN & OUT PUNCHED BY THE DEFENDING CHAMPION AND ARGUABLY THE BIGGEST STAR IN THE SPORT.
    Thats you explaining how Pac won. Most people saw a counter puncher effectively contolling the fight from round 1 through 12.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by subhuman View Post
      Lol damn, Ether by Larry.

      Oh and ****im whatever his name is, is simply delusional. Marquez didn't win all three, but he won the 3rd one for sure in my eyes. He's still hurt about Pac knocking down Mosley.
      he been saying JMM won all 2 befor Pac fougth Mosley JACKASS
      FAIL
      Last edited by solo20; 10-09-2012, 06:43 AM.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by solo20 View Post
        he been saying JMM won all 3 befor Pac fougth Mosley JACKASS
        FAIL
        trolling with red k to back it up... not surprising.

        I have one question for you buddy, how exactly was he saying JMM won all 3 when Pacquiao fought MOSLEY BEFORE MARQUEZ 3?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by subhuman View Post
          trolling with red k to back it up... not surprising.

          I have one question for you buddy, how exactly was he saying JMM won all 3 when Pacquiao fought MOSLEY BEFORE MARQUEZ 3?

          Puga already proved that red k bars are meaningless.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
            Puga already proved that red k bars are meaningless.
            Then why disable? It's only my observation that most people in red K are trolls, and that proved it dearly above. Not all, but most.

            Anyway, it's not hard to tell that Naazim is still mad about Mosley.

            Comment


            • #66
              Let the Pac nuthuggers jump all over Naazim now lol. I am fine with giving Pac the 1st fight and I am fine with giving the 2nd fight a draw and even worst case scenario living with the fact they gave it to Pac. But that 3rd fight, that was a travesty man, that was as bad as Pac/Bradley. That robbery was just too blatant and that is why no one should have ANY remorse for Pac being robbed in the Bradley fight. It is 100% karma. This 4th fight, JMM is going to beat Pac's ass silly. Unless Pac lands some miracle left hand thunderbolt from hell, JMM is getting in that ass all night long. Pac looks slower now too and not as energetic, Dinamita is going to get surgical on his ass hopefully, I cannot wait. JMM is ready to put on the upcoming December boxing clinic!

              Comment


              • #67
                How did any of you score the second fight a draw? There was only one knockdown. You can't have it a draw unless you scored an even round somewhere. And if you did, well, you obviously don't need to be judging anything.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Alpha & Omega View Post
                  That robbery was just too blatant and that is why no one should have ANY remorse for Pac being robbed in the Bradley fight. It is 100% karma. This 4th fight, JMM is going to beat Pac's ass silly. Unless Pac lands some miracle left hand thunderbolt from hell, JMM is getting in that ass all night long. Pac looks slower now too and not as energetic, Dinamita is going to get surgical on his ass hopefully, I cannot wait. JMM is ready to put on the upcoming December boxing clinic!
                  Bold shows your ignorance. How in any way shape or form was Pacquiao responsible for what the judges saw in the Marquez fight? I too, had it going to Marquez but to call it Karma just shows you how much of a ignorant dummy you really are.

                  That's like saying Floyd should get blatantly robbed for losing to Castillo years ago. Use your brain kids.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Pacquiao fans were all over Naz when he said "If you don't like Pacquiao, you don't like boxing"

                    A little consistency is nice.

                    For the record I gave Pacquiao the second fight and JMM the other two. Only gave him the third one by a significant margin.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Alpha & Omega View Post
                      Let the Pac nuthuggers jump all over Naazim now lol. I am fine with giving Pac the 1st fight and I am fine with giving the 2nd fight a draw and even worst case scenario living with the fact they gave it to Pac. But that 3rd fight, that was a travesty man, that was as bad as Pac/Bradley. That robbery was just too blatant and that is why no one should have ANY remorse for Pac being robbed in the Bradley fight. It is 100% karma. This 4th fight, JMM is going to beat Pac's ass silly. Unless Pac lands some miracle left hand thunderbolt from hell, JMM is getting in that ass all night long. Pac looks slower now too and not as energetic, Dinamita is going to get surgical on his ass hopefully, I cannot wait. JMM is ready to put on the upcoming December boxing clinic!

                      JMM is a legend. A 'G'. A boxing god.

                      But he is 40 years old and a lightweight. This fight is at 14
                      7.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP