Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Naazim RICHARDSON: "I Don't Think Pacquiao Can Beat Marquez... JMM Won All 3"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    i felt Marquez won the 1st n 3rd, i felt he lost the 2nd but it could of gone either way a draw would of been a fair score

    i got all 3 fights DVR so i watch every now n then, this week im really hyped for saturdays fights so daily ill be watching some DVR, Diaz vs Marquez, Vasquez vs Marquez all 3, all the fights in HD 60inch LED
    Last edited by TX_BOXNG; 10-08-2012, 04:00 PM.

    Comment


    • #42
      I have always felt that the first two were close, but the 3rd fight was a blatant robbery and Marquez won without a doubt.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by _original_ View Post
        I have always felt that the first two were close, but the 3rd fight was a blatant robbery and Marquez won without a doubt.
        yep i thought Marquez was gona be competitive the first few rounds, but man he school pacman so easy i couldnt believe!!!!!!!

        8-4 116-112 Marquez was robbed

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post

          what's so funny about that?

          take every single fight that has ever happened in the world,

          the person with the worse looking face usually lost right?

          now you add the fact that he was out thrown and out landed by the winner,

          why would that be funny?

          Originally posted by _original_ View Post
          I have always felt that the first two were close, but the 3rd fight was a blatant robbery and Marquez won without a doubt.

          how could it be a blatant robbery when the loser was out thrown and out landed by the defending champion not to mention his face looked worse?

          how is that a robbery?

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by DTMB View Post
            what's so funny about that?

            take every single fight that has ever happened in the world,

            the person with the worse looking face usually lost right?

            now you add the fact that he was out thrown and out landed by the winner,

            why would that be funny?




            how could it be a blatant robbery when the loser was out thrown and out landed by the defending champion not to mention his face looked worse?

            how is that a robbery?
            I know you ufc fans dont understand ring generalship and defense and counter punching etc etc etc

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
              I know you ufc fans dont understand ring generalship and defense and counter punching etc etc etc

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
                I know you ufc fans dont understand ring generalship and defense and counter punching etc etc etc
                they are more like WWE fans UFC fans are not that ******
                and i also had JMM wining all 3

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by DTMB View Post
                  how could it be a blatant robbery when the loser was out thrown and out landed by the defending champion not to mention his face looked worse?

                  how is that a robbery?
                  Oh you're going by the 100% accurate compubox and by what Jim Lampley said right?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
                    I know you ufc fans dont understand ring generalship and defense and counter punching etc etc etc
                    why dont you answer the question instead of trying to flame.

                    btw,

                    i hate ufc but nice job trying to discredit the post because you cant meet it head on.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by _original_ View Post
                      Oh you're going by the 100% accurate compubox and by what Jim Lampley said right?
                      i hate jim lampley and i know compubox is not a infallible super computer but its just another tool to give fans another take on the fight.

                      Its part of boxing.

                      Its not as if compubox has been proven incompetent and puts out numbers that dont support the winner of the fight. Most of the time, its data supports the winner.

                      Its not perfect, but its better than nothing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP