Comments Thread For: Bradley's Trainer Rips Pacquiao: He's on His Way Out!

[WESS]

Right so a duck is only a duck when you "care" about it? Don't you think that's a tad hypocritical?

Bradley is doing nothing more than begging for a payday, that is obvious enough. Stop with the ducking nonsense. Bradley clearly lost to Pac, Pac clearly struggled and arguably lost every fight he's had with JMM. Not only is he fighting the tougher opponent he's fighting the guy who brings more money to the table. It's a no brainer.

I get it, you want to praise Pac for taking the tougher challenge yet bash Bradley for not wanting to take easier fight with Khan rather than the tougher fight with Pac...

I see the double standards quit clearly now. The problems you have with all of this, is Bradley in fact has a win over Pac and is willing to correct the error or prove that there was no error. Also, the majority of the boxing community thinks this JMM IV fight is a waste.

Again, Pac didn't even want JMM. He wanted Cotto. Pac ONLY had three names to choose from. Can you guess who they where? Bradley, Cotto and JMM... After eliminating the other two Pac had no option. Again, your argument about Pac taking the tougher challenge rather than Bradley is moot, or should I say Bradley taking the tougher Challenge vs Pac rather than Khan is moot.

We know its about the money and trying to compete with Maywether's PPV numbers. I said this years ago... no surprise on my part. I'm just calling it like it is, a TRUE Champion wouldn't let someone walk away with their belt when given the opportunity to make it right. The only pass Pac would have been given is if he was fighting Mayweather, CLEARLY Bob said he was not looking to make that fight and gave Pac 3 names that I provided you with earlier. In the meantime, Pac is ducking the WW division for a 3rd time in a row.

[ddangerous]

That's not him saying he thought he lost the fight tho??

It is to me, Rome. No one says after lifting a belt off of the champion, that they need to rewatch the fight to see if they won. It is lunacy.

Fasle. Pac in fact has two wins over him. Pac in fact has ZERO wins over Bradley. I bet that if you do your math correctly you can figure out the answer here.

Everyone knew Bradley wouldn't sell the first time Pac stepped in the ring, so making up this "money" excuse now is moot. Pac lost and had an opportunity to make it right but ducked. We all know Pac can't match Mayweather type PPV numbers and Pac couldn't even break a million with Bradley and that makes Bob Arum look like a liar. Yet everyone knew this and now money is the excuse after Pac loses? lol yeah..... ok.

Sorry, a duck is a duck. In boxing you fight the best and if the best is not available you fight the second or third best. Can ANYONE tell me when Pac has done this in the WW division?

Wess, are you honestly insinuating that you think Bradley is better than JMM? The tougher challenge? If so, we are all entitled to our opinions, but that is a TOUGH pill to swallow. There is no way, in my opinion, Bradley was more competitive against Pacquiao than JMM has always been. Tim clearly lost the fight in my eyes and in the overwhelming majority of the eyes that watched the fight.

[WESS]

It is to me, Rome. No one says after lifting a belt off of the champion, that they need to rewatch the fight to see if they won. It is lunacy.



Wess, are you honestly insinuating that you think Bradley is better than JMM? The tougher challenge? If so, we are all entitled to our opinions, but that is a TOUGH pill to swallow. There is no way, in my opinion, Bradley was more competitive against Pacquiao than JMM has always been. Tim clearly lost the fight in my eyes and in the overwhelming majority of the eyes that watched the fight.

Nobody said bradley is or isn't the tougher challenge. What I said was, just because people thought Pac beat Bradley doesn't change history. Just like the entire boxing community thought that JMM has won at least one of the three fights between him and Pac. There is even a very small group of people that think JMM won at least one minute of one round vs Floyd in the one and only fight they had years ago when everyone said JMM should never ever fight at WW EVER again. This does not change the outcome of the fight. Bradley 1-0, JMM 0-2-1.

We get it though, everyone know's Pac's PPV numbers do not compete with Floyd's. Which is what this is all about. If Bradley could help Pac sell more this fight would have happened again.

However here is a little insight for you, Pac ducked Floyd to fight Clottey and that was a fail on PPV and money in comparison. Mayweather Mosley pulled in nearly 1.5 million PPV's, yet Pac ducked Mosley (when WW Champ) and that would have at least sold well over a million at that time. Pac ducked BIG PPV fights for bums. Bob STILL hasn't released official PPV's numbers. Point is, Pac has ducked bigger fights that sold more PPV's for **** fighters for less PPV's.

It's only about the money when the situation is beneficial for Pac. In this case fighting Bradley where he will pull in less than a million is now being used as a duck just so he can fight guys he already beat but will bring in more PPV's.

[croz]

The closest thing we have to an official announcement said Pac-Bradley did 950k ... not 750k ... not 800k.

[IMDAZED]

Wess, are you honestly insinuating that you think Bradley is better than JMM? The tougher challenge? If so, we are all entitled to our opinions, but that is a TOUGH pill to swallow. There is no way, in my opinion, Bradley was more competitive against Pacquiao than JMM has always been. Tim clearly lost the fight in my eyes and in the overwhelming majority of the eyes that watched the fight.

Marquez may appear to be the tougher challenge style-wise but I don't understand why people are short-changing Bradley. He appeared to have Manny figured out pretty well in the latter rounds of their fight and if they square off again, Manny is in deep **** if that version shows up. And to add on, how many of you would put money on Marquez beating Bradley if the two ever squared off? It may happen if Marquez surprises in December and I'd take on all bets.

[ModernTalking]

Marquez may appear to be the tougher challenge style-wise but I don't understand why people are short-changing Bradley. He appeared to have Manny figured out pretty well in the latter rounds of their fight and if they square off again, Manny is in deep **** if that version shows up. And to add on, how many of you would put money on Marquez beating Bradley if the two ever squared off? It may happen if Marquez surprises in December and I'd take on all bets.

Bradley running a Blt(h and fighting to survive to see the end.

******s: Bradley has PAC all figure out .

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Bradley running a Blt(h and fighting to survive to see the end.

******s: Bradley has PAC all figure out .

Pacquiao coasted in the last few rounds and for most of the fight in all honesty. It was actually sad to see someone so comfortably outclassed on such a big occasion.