That Vitali Klitschko ranking calculation in full...
Collapse
-
LMAOCheers mate... it's all just in fun, ain't it? The Kliteratti bite though, don't they? Apparently you're a racist if you don't think Wlad vs Imbragimov was as good as Hagler vs Hearns.
Is it true that the only reason why the two brothers have never fought is because if Wlad lost, there'd be no one to take the rematch?
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Nice list.01) Ali
02) Louis
03) Holmes
04) Foreman
05) Lewis
06) Frazier
07) Marciano
08) Tyson
09) Holyfield
10) Johnson
11) Dempsey
12) Liston
13) Jeffries
14) Wlad
15) Schmeling
16) Bowe
17) Vitali
18) Patterson
19) Charles
20) Walcott
I have him at 17 on my HW list. I'll have to wait until Wlad's career is completed so I can properly gauge were he fits, he may be able to crack my Top 10.
I'd have Patterson way above Vitali though.Comment
-
Comment
-
vitali is an iron chinned champ.
he proved he can go to war and fight a masterful fight.
vitali for me is definitely top 20Comment
-
Sadly..... boxing fans today are not very knowledgable because little do they know how true this statement really is. THE MOST DOMINANT HEAVYWEIGHT OF ALLTIME & people just COMPLETELY refuse to admit it creating all sorts of denials & excuses for it & TRUST ME WHEN I TELL YOU THIS... EVERY
SINGLE HATER knows that he's been by far the most dominant heavyweight that ever lived but won't let themselves agree with the back of there minds because it goes against everything they stand for as a boxing fan.... Overwhelming evidence suggests that if i bought my case to a courtroom & we based it ON performance alone & nothing else the runnerup is nowhere to be seen,, that's how far ahead he is from his nearest runnerup.
We can't even admit that he's simply been the most dominant heavyweight champion based oN THE SINGLE CRITERIA of how he's handled his opponents which every single piece of statistical data & compubox figures support. If we do this.. We're ALREADY ADMITTING something that we can't go back on... so what do we do to admit how dominant he's been without actually admitting he has been? We give him fictional credit as a top 5 H2HEAD nightmare for any heavy prior to him... Sorry but that's a load of crap... i'm not accepting such a lame consolation prize.. you either admit he's the toughest H2H or you don't say jack about it as THAT DOESN'T GET YOU OFF THE HOOK.
Further evidence suggests that Vitali BY FAR is most ridiculed for his opposition THAN ANY FIGHTER in the history of boxing on boxing forums.
Why are we doing this? Can't we just say he's not great WITHOUT a complete list of the resumes of all his opposition? WhY are they always brought up when we're talking about how Vitali fights. His two defeats are the most scutinized defeats in the history of the heavyweight division? Why is that? Is it because after WE GET PAST those resume dehancers.. there's COMPLETE & UTTER DESTRUCTION?
Do the math my friends..... i already did & have gotten an A FOR IT.Last edited by jimmy1569; 09-10-2012, 08:16 PM.Comment
Comment