That Vitali Klitschko ranking calculation in full...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tiozzo
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 6234
    • 278
    • 330
    • 6,886

    #61
    Originally posted by jimmy1569
    I COULD care less who's getting a Vitali Klitschko beatdown... it's you guys that concern yourself with that. Whomever signs a contract & dares to get in the ring with him whether it's a top 5 great like Lewis or a top 5 Euro level can like Charr.... the results will always be the same... a dr.stoppage due to cuts.
    common sense separates you from the rest of the world son

    that's not healthy

    Comment

    • Tiozzo
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 6234
      • 278
      • 330
      • 6,886

      #62
      Originally posted by !! Anorak
      Cheers mate... it's all just in fun, ain't it? The Kliteratti bite though, don't they? Apparently you're a racist if you don't think Wlad vs Imbragimov was as good as Hagler vs Hearns.


      Is it true that the only reason why the two brothers have never fought is because if Wlad lost, there'd be no one to take the rematch?
      LMAO

      Comment

      • !! Anorak
        • Feb 2026
        • 4,530
        • 10,898
        • 0

        #63
        I like the Klits okay, but the signed up members of the Kliteratti need help, don't they?

        I heard one of them the other day asking why they don't develop Clinch-U-Box, so Wlad can smash all world records.

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 49458
          • 5,024
          • 270
          • 104,043

          #64
          Originally posted by !! Anorak
          You're just a joke poster, right? You're a troll, yes?
          Yes, he most definitely is.

          Comment

          • Vasyl’s dad
            He said no rematch
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 23510
            • 1,120
            • 1,945
            • 50,072

            #65
            Vitali is the GOAT Heavyweight. Simply too dominant.

            Comment

            • Welsh Jon
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • May 2011
              • 922
              • 72
              • 43
              • 7,717

              #66
              Originally posted by damuttz112
              01) Ali
              02) Louis
              03) Holmes
              04) Foreman
              05) Lewis
              06) Frazier
              07) Marciano
              08) Tyson
              09) Holyfield
              10) Johnson
              11) Dempsey
              12) Liston
              13) Jeffries
              14) Wlad
              15) Schmeling
              16) Bowe
              17) Vitali
              18) Patterson
              19) Charles
              20) Walcott



              I have him at 17 on my HW list. I'll have to wait until Wlad's career is completed so I can properly gauge were he fits, he may be able to crack my Top 10.
              Nice list.

              I'd have Patterson way above Vitali though.

              Comment

              • jimmy1569
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2005
                • 2920
                • 114
                • 0
                • 3,083

                #67
                Originally posted by Tiozzo
                common sense separates you from the rest of the world son

                that's not healthy
                I was making a funny... but since you take everything someone says literally.. you miss out on common sense of humor & sarcasm!

                Comment

                • jimmy1569
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 2920
                  • 114
                  • 0
                  • 3,083

                  #68
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                  Yes, he most definitely is.
                  Bite me... if i'm a troll... then i'd have to be the best mothereffin' one to ever step foot on A Klitschko forum & take all you haters on all by myself & still manage to school all of you for the majority of the debates.

                  Comment

                  • Pugilist King
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Sep 2012
                    • 131
                    • 6
                    • 0
                    • 202

                    #69
                    vitali is an iron chinned champ.

                    he proved he can go to war and fight a masterful fight.

                    vitali for me is definitely top 20

                    Comment

                    • jimmy1569
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 2920
                      • 114
                      • 0
                      • 3,083

                      #70
                      Originally posted by El Gallo Negro!
                      Vitali is the GOAT Heavyweight. Simply too dominant.
                      Sadly..... boxing fans today are not very knowledgable because little do they know how true this statement really is. THE MOST DOMINANT HEAVYWEIGHT OF ALLTIME & people just COMPLETELY refuse to admit it creating all sorts of denials & excuses for it & TRUST ME WHEN I TELL YOU THIS... EVERY
                      SINGLE HATER knows that he's been by far the most dominant heavyweight that ever lived but won't let themselves agree with the back of there minds because it goes against everything they stand for as a boxing fan.... Overwhelming evidence suggests that if i bought my case to a courtroom & we based it ON performance alone & nothing else the runnerup is nowhere to be seen,, that's how far ahead he is from his nearest runnerup.

                      We can't even admit that he's simply been the most dominant heavyweight champion based oN THE SINGLE CRITERIA of how he's handled his opponents which every single piece of statistical data & compubox figures support. If we do this.. We're ALREADY ADMITTING something that we can't go back on... so what do we do to admit how dominant he's been without actually admitting he has been? We give him fictional credit as a top 5 H2HEAD nightmare for any heavy prior to him... Sorry but that's a load of crap... i'm not accepting such a lame consolation prize.. you either admit he's the toughest H2H or you don't say jack about it as THAT DOESN'T GET YOU OFF THE HOOK.

                      Further evidence suggests that Vitali BY FAR is most ridiculed for his opposition THAN ANY FIGHTER in the history of boxing on boxing forums.


                      Why are we doing this? Can't we just say he's not great WITHOUT a complete list of the resumes of all his opposition? WhY are they always brought up when we're talking about how Vitali fights. His two defeats are the most scutinized defeats in the history of the heavyweight division? Why is that? Is it because after WE GET PAST those resume dehancers.. there's COMPLETE & UTTER DESTRUCTION?


                      Do the math my friends..... i already did & have gotten an A FOR IT.
                      Last edited by jimmy1569; 09-10-2012, 08:16 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP