"Always down for the catchweight like Pacquiao"

[ADP02]

fixed it for you...

lol ... thanks for correcting my mistake.

[The Big Dunn]

Ok, point taking. Now how many catchweight title fights does Pacman have in a division where he is or was a 2 time champion in??

they both have none. but manny has also never been a two time champion in a division while he's the lineal champ in the divsion directly below it.

[The Big Dunn]

Manny who held the WW title, came in at 143 when he fought Marquez. That was NOT an advantage for Manny. That is like faulting Canelo for a CW at 152 against Floyd. So you can delete that from your count.

The other 2 were the first time that Manny fought against a true WW and JMM. After that, he never did a CW again in the same division. You want to criticize because they were title fights? No problem ...

The big difference is that Floyd has already fought TWICE at 154 and currently has a title there and is P4P #1. When has Manny done a CW where he held the title in that division (for his own advantage)?

Manny has 2 CWs.
Floyd has 2 CWs.

When Floyd fought at 154 he told us, he didn't want to drain his fighters like Manny did. Floyd is a hypocrite for saying that 2lbs drains but now did it himself.

Floyd, in my books, has become the NEW CW KING!

actually its like criticizing floyd for coming in at 146 against JMM. but its still a cw and I counted it for both. you want to throw it out to make manny look better. wow what a pig you are. but you can't change the truth no matter how you try.

floyd didn't need a cw first time he was in ww or JMW.

When he fought JMM at 144. your biased opinion that it didn't help many has no weight or bearing. Manny defended his title at a CW. and floyd hasn't fought Canelo yet. SO you can try silly little tricks but thats what desperate fringe fans of manny like you have to do. ANyway you cut it Manny has fought in more cw's than floyd. period.

your book is irrelevant. the truth is Manny won his ww and JMW title at cw and defended at a cw vs JMM. thats 3. floyd cw jmm in a non title fight. thats 1. In NSB language:

3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1

and if you want to take JMM off for both:

2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>0

I suggest you pivot and work on ways to make manny not a hypocrite for finally having testing for fights. Much like reloaded-your time is coming.

[Bushbaby]

they both have none. but manny has also never been a two time champion in a division while he's the lineal champ in the divsion directly below it.

So then, Floyd's trailblazing, becoming the 1st to do it. Must be nice.

[Jack Napier]

where's Reloaded? :laugh:

"that's right! Pac use the CW , you kids don't understand ! Cotto forced by Arum and Pac and said he won't sacrifice his body again like he did for 145 ! Clearly he was badly drained , but Floyd fought him where his weight was at his best! Shame you kids don't know boxing how weight works !" :laugh:

[The Big Dunn]

So then, Floyd's trailblazing, becoming the 1st to do it. Must be nice.

its not trailblazing unless you are looking for ways to criticize him and the fight beyond floyd being a hypocrite. Otherwise its just the same as ODH v bhop.

[hectari]

We been trying to tell these idiots for so long that nobody forced or put a gun to Cotto or Margos head to fight Pacman at that weight they both agreed, but they rode hard on that to discredit Pacman, now that Floyd is doing it they are trying to use the same argument that they ignored and didn't find credible saying nobody forced Canelo they both agreed its negotiations and he will not be drained he is big to make the fight fair lmao.

This is why nobody takes these idiots serious, they live in their own world and have no shame or embarrassment, they are delusional and their replies are you guys just want to really hate on Floyd.

Now they expect us to give Floyd credit for his win over Canelo after this hypocrisy, the only way Floyd gets credit is it they give credit to Pacquiao and discredit Floyds win over cotto with their logic by saying Cotto was just a shot left over from Pacman, and the funniest part is a shot, bloated Cotto even did a better job against Floyd than he did against Pacman.

[HeroBando]

its not trailblazing unless you are looking for ways to criticize him and the fight beyond floyd being a hypocrite. Otherwise its just the same as ODH v bhop.

Interesting you're happy with that comparison, as DLH was a 1x subpaper champ at MW. You'd hope for a little better from Floyd at SWW, he comes in with way better looking credentials at the weight.

[hectari]

Interesting you're happy with that comparison, as DLH was a 1x subpaper champ at MW. You'd hope for a little better from Floyd at SWW, he comes in with way better looking credentials at the weight.

What matters is Floyds words and his fans words. That is enough for them to eat **** and never come back here.

Floyd actually said he doesn't like to drain guys and fights them at their full weight so they are nice and healthy, claimed cotto was undefeated, he attacked Andre Ward for fighting Chad Dawson at 168 instead of 175.

Now he is fighting Canelo at 152.

Dudes legacy is a joke, he just exposed himself as a hypocrite, cherry picker and master of manipulation propaganda and idiots believe it.

worst part is these guys on here saying everyone knows Floyd is a hypocrite! basically he can do whatever he wants because they are fans of his.

[BoxingGenius27]

Both sides are at fault here.

Pac should've never fought Marg at 150, especially since "him and Floyd are the same size", as many put it.

Pac should've never fought Cotto at 145 when he fought several guys at 147 (DLH and Clottey).

Floyd shouldn't be fighting Canelo at 152 when he fought several guys at 154.

This is simple stuff, but since so many guys pull for Pac, they say it's ok. Since soo many people pull for Floyd, they say it's ok.

Both sides are obviously biased.