"Easy win over Abraham" - how is this an easy win? Is Abraham not a credible opponent? Also, I'd say Dirrell & AA have unfinished business. If I was Dirrell I'd want to smash Abraham after losing two years due to his illegal blow.
He lost 2 years because he's an idiot. Let's be real, the guy lied about his so-called injuries. He was acting from the beginning.
check out the right hook that ya boy martinez hit barker with at the end of their fight. it wasnt even the hardest shot he hit him with.
sometimes a punch does not effect a man instantly. it happens all the time. a guy gets cracked, remains upright, then wobbles and falls down.
the fact remains that if dirrell took a flush abraham punch on the jaw while on a knee and completely defenseless he's a mastermind actor with a rock solid chin.
and you guys who say it wasnt a flush shot... do you see it hit him right on the jaw? did you blink every time you replayed the fight or something?
Being stunned from a punch like that is one thing, being unable to box for two years is another. A busted ear drum is a bit different from some vague brain trauma that this doctor was unable to decisively define.
Let him come back and fight whom ever he wishes.....good luck to him. The only person that he could fight with any meaning is your boy Ward...the guy he was afraid to fight two years ago. I would like to seem them scrap, I am eager to see what the excuse not to make it happen will be this time though.
One thing that did surprise me is how easily Froch was able to inflict damage on him... Dirrell's nose and mouth were bleeding heavily after about 3-4 rounds and he'd hardly been hit. I often wonder what would have happened if Dirrell had chosen to open up, but I guess that'd make it a pick 'em, even with the handspeed advantage.
Dirrell stunned Froch though. Now that's what I call doing damage :
Dude, Abraham is notorious for complaining about low blows that aren't really low blows. If u font know this then u clearly don't know the fighter.
I don't think you're well placed to tell me if I clearly know the fighter or not. You haven't posted any video to back what you're saying up by the way. Large majority of those complaints are justified but people love to tell they aren't.
I don't think you're well placed to tell me if I clearly know the fighter or not. You haven't posted any video to back what you're saying up by the way. Large majority of those complaints are justified but people love to tell they aren't.
no1 has to post video to appease u. more than one person in the thread has mentioned it. i guess we are all liars. theres a point where ****riding goes too far, i think uve crossed it. theres no reason to act like he doesnt. its his thing, its not that big of an issue. dont deny he does it tho, he clearly does.
in what way??? even if u had froch winning, he didnt son dirrell at all. it was a ****ty fight. but no1 dominated n no1 looked special. in fact dirrell looked better than froch imo.
Comment