Name some boxers who are being put on a pedestal but havent done anything yet..

[Kagami Taiga]

I don't mind ppl saying broner because its true to some extent but there are much worse offenders out there. Pirog? Yup. Golovkon hasn't beaten anyone either and both guys are pushing thirty. Brook too. So whole broner may be the lost popular around here it's more because ppl don't like him. He's fought better opposition than most on the list.

[onechance87]

broner,rigo,canelo

[apocalypto]

moreno. Even though he beat vic he has done nothing to warrant ******ed people mentioning in the p4p discussion.

[Corelone]

Sal Sanchez ll. I hear good noises about him from disreputable sources.

[The Nephilim]

david price, lucien bute, deontay wilder, ruslan chagaev to a lesser degree...

The Wilder hype has taken off since he beat the last bum on Fox TV.

Suddenly he is gonna beat both Klitschkos on the same night according to some people.

Pretty amusing. He appeals more than Seth Mitchell because Wilder plays to certain stereotypes that Mitchell avoids.

[chiguy91]

Does Vanes count? Berto?

vanes has proving to do but i don't think anyone has him on a pedestal. berto as well is a no go. we all know what's he capable of now, i don't think there's any serious people out there claiming him to be the future king of WW or LMW (if he ever decides to move up).

Gamboa beat Salido.

Broner has beaten Escobedo, Litzau coming off the Caballero upset, Perez, and De Leon.

Canelo has beaten Cintron, Rhodes, and an old Mosley.

He had clearly beaten Bika, Johnson, Miranda, Andrade in the rematch

Fighters who actually have a couple of solid wins are being mentioned here. ****** boxing fans, worst fans in sports.

cintron was proven "shot to shit" coming into the alvarez fight. i think that's why they made it tbh. he lost clearly to molina and then had a sloppy performance that suggested he was honestly past it against antwone smith.
ryan rhodes might have been a mando, but i don't agree with him being merited that position in the first place. he fought above LMW his previous bout, and before that he fought no one inside the top 25/perhaps even 50 to claim he should get a shot at the title.
mosley was a joke of a fight. only reason that was made was because of $$$ and i think you know that. there is no way someone should list that as a credible win for alvarez when thinking about how "legit" he is.

to me, this is what alvarez falls into (i'm pretty sure this post was directed towards alvarez anyways):

Beating a decent name/contender is one thing, beating a top fighter and top 10 pfp guy is another.

[Ringlife]

I would have to say Broner.

[danceswithfire]

broner and rigo

[Frank Ducketts]

Here's what you think

Mexicans- Broner, Floyd, any Puerto Rican fighters

African-Americans- Canelo, Chavez Jr, Rios, Berto, Terry Norris,

Filipinos- Floyd, Broner, Rigondeaux, Mexican fighters not named Morales, Floyd, Floyd, Floyd

Puerto Ricans-Salido, Margarito, any Mexican fighters

Europeans (Americans)-Wladimir Klitschko

[Visceral]

Canello, a thousand times, canello.