In terms of talent he is #1 IMO. When evaluating career he is still top 5 but he was inactive for a little while at times during his career which hurts him. However when I think of talent, Ray Leonard is #1.
Why CANT Sugar Ray Leonard be the best of all time?
Collapse
-
-
Oh no you didnt the site historians will have your head for this.Comment
-
-
Tommy didn't beat leonard, and the rematch was Hearns to win until that terrible last round.
Leonard > HearnsComment
-
Comment
-
He also lost to Duran and then Duran got fed up of his games in the second fight and quit. Fought a declining Hagler who had been talking about retirement, got a generous decision and refused a rematch.Comment
-
He is the best i have ever seen hand's down,i cannot count guys like Greb or Robinson cause there just is not enough tape on them,and i cant understand how people can rate someone from what a boxing writer wrote at the time i have read a 100 articles that proclaimed Pacquiao the best ww when i know its not true,i am sure they played favs back then also.
I'm not enough of a boxing historian to run down all the reasons, point by point, why Robinson is the GOAT. But I can certainly tell you that not seeing him fight isn't a good enough reason to argue against all the historians, boxing experts and legendary fighters that cite the original "Sugar" as the greatest.Comment
Comment