I have to say I hadn't watch the fight before reading this article. So after reading the article and a few of the comments on here, I thought I would see if I could find the fight on the web. The only link I could find was the BBC one, so I signed into HideMyAss.com and checked it out.
I started watching the fight, and paused it after the first round, just to check if I was watching the same fight. From what I had read by Jake Donovan "Cammarelle was only up 6-5 after one round, despite nearly knocking out Joshua and having him in trouble throughout the round" LMAO what, thats just total garbage, infact apart form the last 30 seconds cammarell did nothing, joshua wasn't even close to being out on his feet.
I started the player again, and watch the second round, a round according to Jake Donovan cammarelle dominated. after watch the second round and seeing cammarelle CLEARLY lose the round, and still given it, I thought ahhh its the british fighter their are saying was robbed. So I check the article again, and no its cammarelle their talking about.
So I watch the rest of the fight and thought, the brit had won it clearly.
Still not understanding where all the shouts of "robbery" came from I decided to rewatch and score the fight myself. So I rewatch it, and score every scoring punch (i.e punches to the target area with the nuckle part of the glove), and not only did I having joshua winning, I had him leading going into the 3rd round and winning the fight by a wide margin.
Even when I watch the fight and try and score it for cammarelle, I still score it for joshua.
I would suggest anybody who thinks cammarelle won that fight, either didn't watch it, didnt score it or is just biased.
P.S. I would love to see how those who thought cammarelle won it, score it, and a list of the punches he landed and when in the round. I have a list if anyone is interested, as I dont state something without backing it up.
I started watching the fight, and paused it after the first round, just to check if I was watching the same fight. From what I had read by Jake Donovan "Cammarelle was only up 6-5 after one round, despite nearly knocking out Joshua and having him in trouble throughout the round" LMAO what, thats just total garbage, infact apart form the last 30 seconds cammarell did nothing, joshua wasn't even close to being out on his feet.
I started the player again, and watch the second round, a round according to Jake Donovan cammarelle dominated. after watch the second round and seeing cammarelle CLEARLY lose the round, and still given it, I thought ahhh its the british fighter their are saying was robbed. So I check the article again, and no its cammarelle their talking about.
So I watch the rest of the fight and thought, the brit had won it clearly.
Still not understanding where all the shouts of "robbery" came from I decided to rewatch and score the fight myself. So I rewatch it, and score every scoring punch (i.e punches to the target area with the nuckle part of the glove), and not only did I having joshua winning, I had him leading going into the 3rd round and winning the fight by a wide margin.
Even when I watch the fight and try and score it for cammarelle, I still score it for joshua.
I would suggest anybody who thinks cammarelle won that fight, either didn't watch it, didnt score it or is just biased.
P.S. I would love to see how those who thought cammarelle won it, score it, and a list of the punches he landed and when in the round. I have a list if anyone is interested, as I dont state something without backing it up.
Comment