You might as well respond to my above post. Struggles when he has to attack? I advise you go watch a prime Hopkins as he was, for the most part the aggressor, and Floyd's inside game is not better than Hopkins, I would say Hopkins' is better. Hopkins operated better in the clinches as well. Floyd was the better boxer though.
who's higher on your ATG list? Mayweather or Hopkins
Collapse
-
-
Hopkins top wins
Winky Wright - Top 3 P4P
Tito Trinidad - Top 3 P4P
Antonio Tarver - Top 10 P4P
Kelly Pavlik - Top 10 P4P
Its not close. B-Hop>>>>>>>FloydComment
-
Comment
-
He could take another young fighter's O by beating Cleverly or Cloud if he beats Pascal, while beating his own record for oldest man to win a world title.
You need to take into account the fact that half these great fighters were smaller than Hop, while Floyd was the smaller man moving up when he beat most of his best opponents.
Also Floyd fought the #1 guy in 4 of his 5 weightclasses and is the only undefeated 5 division champ.
All in all, Personally I'm far more impressed with Hopkins resume win or lose because like I said outside of his losses to Jones & Dawson, the rest were controversial.Comment
-
Hopkins has far too many losses.
Gotta give this one to May.Comment
-
Comment
-
no, they werent. they were ranked fighters in their division pavlik was the mw champ yes. they werent p4p. where were u looking boxrec? theres no way in hell tarver was p4p. and pavlik wasnt either.Comment
-
lol at ranked in their division. Both Pavlik and Tarver were unanimous champions in their divisions and top 10 P4P I don't have to look this up it was common knowledge based on who they beat.Comment
-
Comment