I wasn't overly impressed with it, he made Escobedo drain himself something silly whilst he seemingly came in at what he pleased rather unprofessionally though it was a pretty good performance I give him that. He stopped him in 5, The Ghost for me fought a better version, dropped him twice & near enough shut him out which IMO is just as good.
Race, colour, nationality has nothing to do with it. I support & follow boxers of all colours, nationalities & race.
I want to see him tested, I really do believe Escobedo is better than Lundy, do you not? Shouldn't he be making progress?
You do know that Broner wanted the fight at 135 right??? So how was he draining Escobedo???
Vazquez, Abril, Burns/Mitchell winner are surely by far the most proven?
The reason I ask is because whilst I expect him to probably take a tune up at his new weight class I keep hearing a name being thrown around for being a potential opponent seemingly everybody wants to see fight him, he goes by the name of Henry Lundy aka hammering Hank.
Why would you want to see this? Any of you...
What would this fight prove? Its a step down from Jason Litzau, real talk.
This guy is a horrific fighter, pretty tiny & has one of if not the worst chins in professional boxing. To his credit he has got up & won most, around 60% by robbery, mind you.
Why would you put Broner in with a guy like Lundy? It proves nothing at all. It would just be a brutal one sided affair that would last 4 rounds max, being generous to Lundy.
I wanted Broner to fight Lundy because he was #1 WBC contender, and beating him would've put Broner in line to fight the winner of DeMarco/Molina.
Now, Broner is #4 WBC, #7 IBF, #1 WBO. So his next fight will probably be the winner of Burns/Mitchell.
Tweet
Comment