Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley: Pacquiao is Declining, I'll Beat Him Easier!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    If you gonna believe what Timothy Bradley been talking about, then he should have KO'd Pacman or even Knock him down, or even won the fight by Unanimous decision, if Pacman was declining.

    Anyway, if there's gonna be rematch, then it should be staged in a Neutral Country, with Neutral Referee & Judges.Preferably Non-Americans and Non-Asians.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Rolaz View Post
      If you gonna believe what Timothy Bradley been talking about, then he should have KO'd Pacman or even Knock him down, or even won the fight by Unanimous decision, if Pacman was declining.

      Anyway, if there's gonna be rematch, then it should be staged in a Neutral Country, with Neutral Referee & Judges.Preferably Non-Americans and Non-Asians.
      Terrible logic. After all Mosley was clearly & I mean clearly declined, shot, there to be had, when he fought Pacman. Why wasn't that declining, mummified ,old fighter ko'd??

      Comment


      • #83
        He is right..

        Ever since the steroid **** blew up and he wasn't getting made to order opponents Pacquiao has not looked great..

        Certainly nowhere near what he looked like vs Cotto/Margs/Hatton

        Which one is it? i don't know.. possibly both?

        Hatton/Margs are perfect for Pac..

        Cotto fought a ****** fight and brawled..

        Anyone who has shown a bit of movement has made pac look fairly ordinary or beaten him (Marquez/Bradley)

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
          Terrible logic. After all Mosley was clearly & I mean clearly declined, shot, there to be had, when he fought Pacman. Why wasn't that declining, mummified ,old fighter ko'd??
          Come on man, Bradley is young undefeated, and I'll say it again, if Pacman been declining, Bradley should have KO'd him, knock him down or even won the fight by UNANIMOUS,

          Fact is, it was Bradley, who back-pedalled most during the fight,
          he clenched, and avoid exchanging hard punches after he tested Pacman power punches and even admitted in the interview that Pacman was a beast and he was hurt.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Rolaz View Post
            Come on man, Bradley is young undefeated, and I'll say it again, if Pacman been declining, Bradley should have KO'd him, knock him down or even won the fight by UNANIMOUS,

            Fact is, it was Bradley, who back-pedalled most during the fight,
            he clenched, and avoid exchanging hard punches after he tested Pacman power punches and even admitted in the interview that Pacman was a beast and he was hurt.
            A declining fighter & totally shot aren't the same. Pacman didn't stop a totally shot fighter. But you expect a light punching Bradley to stop a declining fight,lol!! if your man can't stop a shot fighter, with his murderous power, I simply don't see why you expect a light puncher to stop an ironed chinned fighter, weird.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
              A declining fighter & totally shot aren't the same. Pacman didn't stop a totally shot fighter. But you expect a light punching Bradley to stop a declining fight,lol!! if your man can't stop a shot fighter, with his murderous power, I simply don't see why you expect a light puncher to stop an ironed chinned fighter, weird.
              My opinion is based on what Bradley is talking & boasting about, and so even you couldn't believe that Bradley can KO a declining Pacman! What I said was that, if Pacman was declining, Bradley could have KO'd him, or Knock him down, or beat him by UNANIMOUS Decision! But his SPLIT DECISION win was very much controversial!

              Comment


              • #87
                Does this guy ever shut up? i mean damn i know he wants anothe Pac payday but its gettin old

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Rolaz View Post
                  My opinion is based on what Bradley is talking & boasting about, and so even you couldn't believe that Bradley can KO a declining Pacman! What I said was that, if Pacman was declining, Bradley could have KO'd him, or Knock him down, or beat him by UNANIMOUS Decision! But his SPLIT DECISION win was very much controversial!
                  Bradley isn't a powerpuncher & Pacman was supposed to be the best fighter in the world. Your expectations of a good fighter (not great) are through the roof. Considering the fighter you're weeping about with his murderous power & top fighter status couldn't stop a shot fighter, that's just weird.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    lololololololol hahahahaha lmafo !!!!!

                    Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                    Bradley pitches a 12 round shutout against Cotto at 145.
                    hahahaha

                    ...........seriously, that just made my day. I legit, almost felt a little pee come out because i was laughing so hard for a second.

                    Miguel would eat Bradley alive... ALIVE.

                    Cotto and top rank are on good terms, lets make a cotto-bradley fight, .... oh wait .... then arum would lose his bradley-cashcow after Cotto destroys him

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Pac may be slowing down a tad physically, but not much. IMO, Pac is pretty much the same guy that struggled with the roughhousing tactics of Agepito Sanchez. He's the same guy the was outb oxed 11 of 12 rounds in his first fight with JMM. And he's the same guy that was outboxed in his very next first with Morales. There's no mystery to Pac. When he has someone in front of him that isn't completely overwhelmed by his speed and power, he becomes a lot less effective because he has nothing else in his game to turn to. The myth of Manny Pacquaio and the reality of him have about as wide a gap as I've seen in 20+ years as a serious fight fan. He's great, no doubt about it. And his greatness has nothing to do with the amount of paper trinkets he's collected along the way. In my eyes, his greatness lies in that a fighter t of his style normally doesn't compete at the elite level the he has for as long as he has. When I first saw him back in the late 90s, no way did I believe that he'd still be one of the world's elites into his 30s. But he is, and that's a testament to how dynamic he is as a prize fighter. But in no way is he the indestructable force he's been made out to be over the last couple years.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP