This site has gone to chite.......
Comments Thread For: Another Disaster: Putting Bad Scores Where They Belong
Collapse
-
-
The only ones who say it was close are the people who think Bradley won, and its only by 2 rounds at most.
For pac its anything ranging from won by 11 rounds to 2 rounds at the very least. And to have Pac winning by only 2 rounds, they had to do everything possible to favour Bradley to get it that close.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
The fight was a wipe out for Pac
Bradley was the challenger, the challenger is to "TAKE" the title away from the champ,,,,he didn't !!!!
The ONLY reason I could possibly give Bradley a round was due to Pac letting off the gas to get some action going to open up Bradley for a KO.
How many times Have we seen Pac do this ?!!! Numerous times.
He will **** his gloves and let the other guy get some confidence to punch and that opens up the guy for a KO
The fight was a wipe out.
The JMM fight was much closer but its very hard to give JMM 4 rounds
8 to 4 PacComment
-
Comment
-
Clearly you are a biased Tim fan if you even think he won all those rounds. To make it worse, you stated that it can't be disputed. Are you serious? I watched the fight again with no sound and Bradley won maybe two rounds. Bradley is over-hyped and the surprised look on his face and his trainer's when the decision was read said it all. Also, the Marquez fight was much closer than this; it's pathetic to think otherwise. Although I thought Marquez edged it out, IMO you have to beat down the champ to become the champ. So, if anyone beat Pacquiao, it was probably Marquez but definitely not Tim.Comment
Comment