Comments Thread For: Another Disaster: Putting Bad Scores Where They Belong

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Another Disaster: Putting Bad Scores Where They Belong

    By Lyle Fitzsimmons - Another big fight. Another big disaster.

    And while nearly two weeks have passed since the Bradley-Pacquiao decision that many labored far and wide to call a “robbery” – though to be honest, I only had it 7-5 for Manny and thought the Marquez III call was far worse – precious little has been done to ensure it won’t happen again next time.

    Yes, in spite of promoters being ashamed, writers being indignant and Congressmen taking it upon themselves to try and sanitize a perpetually sordid sport, I haven’t seen anything of particular merit suggested since a clearly crestfallen Jim Lampley signed off from the MGM Grand.

    In fact, the more days pass… the more it seems no one really cares much anymore.

    The WBO has said it can’t reverse the result, playing the “good and honest judges” card when referring to Duane Ford and CJ Ross, whose 115-113 nods to the new champion sparked the firestorm. [Click Here To Read More]
  • Primera
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2012
    • 1837
    • 128
    • 93
    • 2,330

    #2
    I only had it 7-5 for Manny and thought the Marquez III call was far worse
    yup he has it like the majority of us had it as well.

    but pac bradley was not a robbery, it was close. 115-113

    Comment

    • voneric
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 747
      • 42
      • 0
      • 6,887

      #3
      This writer must of stolen my Meth because i have no idea what he is trying to say. PacMan v Marquez was a bad decision, but the Bradley fight was a robbery. Giving 5 Rounds to Bradley is beyond generous and anyone giving Bradley more than that is insane. Have a feeling this writer had picked Bradley to win and is somehow protecting his claim. Another Disaster should describe this Article

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #4
        Originally posted by Primera
        yup he has it like the majority of us had it as well.

        but pac bradley was not a robbery, it was close. 115-113
        That's the scorecard I respect the most.

        Comment

        • Doctor_Tenma
          Monster
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 33313
          • 1,327
          • 1,249
          • 58,127

          #5
          Originally posted by voneric
          This writer must of stolen my Meth because i have no idea what he is trying to say. PacMan v Marquez was a bad decision, but the Bradley fight was a robbery. Giving 5 Rounds to Bradley is beyond generous and anyone giving Bradley more than that is insane. Have a feeling this writer had picked Bradley to win and is somehow protecting his claim. Another Disaster should describe this Article
          No it's not, Bradley clearly won rounds 1,2,10,11,12, that can't be disputed. One could conceivably score it a draw or for Tim, the real robbery is Marquez-Pacquiao III in which I only gave Manny 3 rounds.

          Comment

          • Mr.Smith
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 407
            • 20
            • 5
            • 6,502

            #6
            This was a very close fight indeed. Most people didn't see it that way partially because of the commentators. Harold Lettermans card was sad especially since he use to be a judge but now one of the HBO boys.

            Comment

            • Mr.Smith
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 407
              • 20
              • 5
              • 6,502

              #7
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy
              No it's not, Bradley clearly won rounds 1,2,10,11,12, that can't be disputed. One could conceivably score it a draw or for Tim, the real robbery is Marquez-Pacquiao III in which I only gave Manny 3 rounds.
              Exactly! I got a red K for saying this and I've been a member here for years.

              Comment

              • imakaiw
                Up and Comer
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Nov 2011
                • 31
                • 2
                • 0
                • 6,064

                #8
                The judges were simply inept. They should not be judging anymore.

                Comment

                • Rapid Counter
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2011
                  • 3164
                  • 392
                  • 724
                  • 10,416

                  #9
                  Did I just read that the writer wants the media to judge fights?

                  Comment

                  • edgarg
                    Honest BoxingScene posts
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 11045
                    • 547
                    • 54
                    • 39,228

                    #10
                    It is SENATORS who are trying to get the boxing mess straightened out-not congressmen.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP