Comments Thread For: Lederman Discusses Pacquiao-Bradley, Judging Issues

[JKidd2624]

This has nothing to do with the judges. It has to do with Arum single handedly trying to make an attraction out of Bradley. He knew Pac would beat Bradley up, so he got the judges to give it to Bradley. Win-win situation for Arum.

My thoughts exactly.

To think a fight this obvious gets scored as terribly as it did with no "foul play" means you're blind or naive to the greed Arum has.

Furthermore, the entire logic - if you want to call it that - behind an 80 year old saying two guys at least 5 years younger than him are too old, I mean really? Does this need to be explained?

It's Arum's puppet work to maximize the money he can get from both Manny and Bradley. Bradley is a power less pillow puncher that can't fill arenas, and now he has the moniker "the guy who ended Manny Pacquiao's run." That'll be a drawing point for Arum down the road promoting his events, rest assured.

[sapaw]

I thoroughly wish everyone just let this thing go!! Again this was NOT on the level of a Williams vs Lara type of decision. This fight was not a blowout and more importantly...... Why in the world do people see this as a scam but you didn't see the scam coming a mile away!!!!!! You did not love Pac-man until Arum claimed Pac was better than Floyd, you did not care about Pac-man until he became connected to Floyd!!! He emerged as somebody who could PROBABLY beat Floyd, so it's safe to say he is the challenger no matter how much people hate to admit it, Floyd is king, Manny is threat to king.

So instead of falsley putting Pac over Floyd or even in the same boat as Floyd, you blind yourself to the whole picture. You need a champ and you need a threat to the champ. We should have been pressing Pac to take what Floyd was offering, IF he could somehow win then he is king now and he dictates how much he gets. Since we fell in love with Pac, we are having a hard time understanding that the SHOW is over. Tim was unified champ, great stamina, undefeated so it SHOULD have been very easy for people to see that they can juice a young Bradley for years so no need to let him lose to a Pac whose on his way out!!!

On Lara-Williams, judges were suspended... go ahead and continue d*ck riding on floyd. END

[BoxingGenius27]

I just don't understand how Ledderman had Mayweather - Hatton being close, but Pac-Bradley a wash out?

What's really going on here.

[Twako]

I thoroughly wish everyone just let this thing go!! Again this was NOT on the level of a Williams vs Lara type of decision. This fight was not a blowout and more importantly...... Why in the world do people see this as a scam but you didn't see the scam coming a mile away!!!!!! You did not love Pac-man until Arum claimed Pac was better than Floyd, you did not care about Pac-man until he became connected to Floyd!!! He emerged as somebody who could PROBABLY beat Floyd, so it's safe to say he is the challenger no matter how much people hate to admit it, Floyd is king, Manny is threat to king.

So instead of falsley putting Pac over Floyd or even in the same boat as Floyd, you blind yourself to the whole picture. You need a champ and you need a threat to the champ. We should have been pressing Pac to take what Floyd was offering, IF he could somehow win then he is king now and he dictates how much he gets. Since we fell in love with Pac, we are having a hard time understanding that the SHOW is over. Tim was unified champ, great stamina, undefeated so it SHOULD have been very easy for people to see that they can juice a young Bradley for years so no need to let him lose to a Pac whose on his way out!!!

FOTD.. nuff said

[Twako]

I just don't understand how Ledderman had Mayweather - Hatton being close, but Pac-Bradley a wash out?

What's really going on here.

hatton had more clear rounds vs floyd, than bradley had against pac. but it still was a clear win for floyd.

[LADIV]

You tell'em Larry L

who the hell is LARRY L no need to comment back to me homey its clear you are a *******

[PAKYO]

Bradley lost.
99% of those who saw the fight has spoken.

Only Pac haters think he won, and of course the paid judges. Even Bradley thinks he lost.
Go figure.

[marvin douglas]

I never agree will Letterman anyway.

[J The UnBiased]

This is interesting.

[riffbox]

Lederman is old as **** and he be off a whole lot in my book. Me and my boys were scoring the fight round for round and had the exact same score as the judges. 115-113 bradley. Aint nobody sitting there counting punches. They are watching the fight live and not on tv. Plus Calzhage vs Hopkins compubox was way off. Yall just think he should get the fight because he is Pacman. But the truth is he lost. Let em fight him again and it will be worst.