So where's all the outrage on judging now?

[dan_cov]

People are only outraged when it happens to their idol.

Very true and IMO this further damages our sport.

''Oh he isn't a big draw so we will sweep it under the carpet''

Sad reality is its getting worse and worse and there is nothing anybody can do about it.

[Hougigo]

Very true and IMO this further damages our sport.

''Oh he isn't a big draw so we will sweep it under the carpet''

Sad reality is its getting worse and worse and there is nothing anybody can do about it.

I hate this.... people only say boxing is dead when it happens in a high profile fight.... only time.
When I saw all those people on twitter saying boxing is dead... I wanted to dick slap them

[nomadman]

This fight could have gone either way, unlike the Pac fight which was a clear domination. Not comparable.

[Hougigo]

This fight could have gone either way, unlike the Pac fight which was a clear domination. Not comparable.

119-109.....119-109 is a card Adamek's family would make
Do people see no problem with that?
I said judge at the start of the damn thread.... judge... singular...
come on people, at least read the first damn post.

[Russian Crushin]

This was targeted at the one judge, not the decision as a whole.

1 judge doesnt decide the winner

Did you see the fight? THere was no way Adamek won twice as many rounds as Chambers

All the scores were crap

[ИATAS]

it's quite obvious the traditional 3 judges to score a fight is deeply flawed and something needs to change. I didn't need Pac-Bradley to tell me this, or the fucktard judge who had adamek winning 119-109, I've known this forever (I'm sure most everyone else has as well). Boxing needs an overhaul when it comes to scoring, my opinion is to simply have 7 or 11 judges. Since boxing is mostly subjective it would be in the sports interest to have a lot more judges, like figure skating which is also a subjective sport. Same goes for MMA.

[hugh grant]

Cos Pac beat brad 10 rounds to 2 and lost a decision, didnt even get a draw.
So not the same.

Pac beat bradley more convincinly than Witaker beat Chavez, but at least witaker got a draw.

[nomadman]

119-109.....119-109 is a card Adamek's family would make
Do people see no problem with that?
I said judge at the start of the damn thread.... judge... singular...
come on people, at least read the first damn post.

Yes, that judge was blind. Don't have a problem with the overall decision though.

[Light_Speed]

it's quite obvious the traditional 3 judges to score a fight is deeply flawed and something needs to change. I didn't need Pac-Bradley to tell me this, or the fucktard judge who had adamek winning 119-109, I've known this forever (I'm sure most everyone else has as well). Boxing needs an overhaul when it comes to scoring, my opinion is to simply have 7 or 11 judges. Since boxing is mostly subjective it would be in the sports interest to have a lot more judges, like figure skating which is also a subjective sport. Same goes for MMA.

It's one of the few aspects of boxing that hasn't evolved along with round duration.

[Hougigo]

1 judge doesnt decide the winner

Did you see the fight? THere was no way Adamek won twice as many rounds as Chambers

All the scores were crap

I know that, but because the decision wasn't affected then the judge isn't punished?
That's a horrible card, why should judges only be punished when the outcome is?
I saw the fight, Eddie was getting it in the start till he hurt his hand.
I could see it being 116-112 because of the home crowd, Adameks activity and Eddies inactivity fighting with one hand.