Should there be a MANDATORY RETIREMENT AGE for Judges?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DeadLikeMe
    ................
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 11968
    • 748
    • 1,409
    • 26,662

    #21
    The retirement age in America is already moved back to like 73.

    I could see a mandatory retirement age for judges at 75, I wouldn't support it but I could understand it.

    There should really be one for referees and fighters as well. The former would be grouped like the judges, but the latter would be for fighters health.

    Comment

    • The Tase
      NSB War Veteran
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 4881
      • 760
      • 646
      • 14,229

      #22
      Originally posted by Big Dunn
      The point is you assciated bad judging with age when its clear there is no direct correlation between the two. You need judges that are professional. Besides, Ive disagreed with Harold several times, just not here.
      are you a moron? there is correlation between old age & diminished mental capacities. why are you arguing this? did you read the op? i gave you two shady judges & their old age.

      there is correlation.

      Lets take a look at another robbery, Paul Williams vs Lara:

      Donald Givens 116-114. Date of Birth 10-2-1934 lmfaaooooo 78 years old?


      I can keep going.

      Comment

      • The Tase
        NSB War Veteran
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 4881
        • 760
        • 646
        • 14,229

        #23
        listen just do the research yourself. trust me, there is correlation between old age & messed up scoring.

        i gotta bow out for a little bit but ill be back...

        Comment

        • Da Hammer
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 3393
          • 118
          • 152
          • 9,752

          #24
          Originally posted by DTMB
          nobody is questioning harold lederman because he got the scores right.

          YOu cannot argue with father time. The older you get the slower your mental capacities get.

          how are you suppose to keep up with world class athletes?
          And because Lederman scorecard doesn't mean ****. He can get it right or wrong all he wants. Anyone who goes by his scorecard is obviously a casual.

          Comment

          • The Big Dunn
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 70251
            • 9,928
            • 8,202
            • 287,568

            #25
            Originally posted by DTMB
            are you a moron? there is correlation between old age & diminished mental capacities. why are you arguing this? did you read the op? i gave you two shady judges & their old age.

            there is correlation.

            Lets take a look at another robbery, Paul Williams vs Lara:

            Donald Givens 116-114. Date of Birth 10-2-1934 lmfaaooooo 78 years old?


            I can keep going.
            There is no direct correlation between bad judging and age. This is your opinion. Being "Shady"-the term you used- is not directly connected to age either. If so, then this would mean Harold Lederman, who is also old, but scored the fight the way you saw it, must also be scoring it wrong because he has diminshed mental capacity.

            Comment

            • Phantomas
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2011
              • 1208
              • 32
              • 9
              • 8,245

              #26
              I feel inclined to respect the elders, they are wise.

              Comment

              • Integrital
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Mar 2004
                • 180
                • 5
                • 0
                • 6,730

                #27
                There shouldn't necessarily be a mandatory retirement age, but when judges clearly get the wrong result, they should be forced to defend their scoring in front of a panel and subject to punishment like suspension or revocation of licenses. Instead guys like Duane Ford, Jerry Roth and Joe Cortez keep getting jobs on a big stage and screwing up. And they'll get more jobs too. There has to be accountability, and this masochistic crap has to stop.

                Comment

                • Lineal Champ
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 712
                  • 36
                  • 19
                  • 7,058

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Da Hammer
                  And because Lederman scorecard doesn't mean ****. He can get it right or wrong all he wants. Anyone who goes by his scorecard is obviously a casual.
                  No one is questioning Harold Lederman because we do not know if he has the a screen in front of him while he is at ringside.

                  Comment

                  • ZMGregg
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 119
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    • 6,555

                    #29
                    Pic of CJ Ross

                    Originally posted by DTMB
                    cant find a pic of cj ross but she is also a old hag who wears glasses...

                    You can find her pic at the web link below. Judges need to have access to the same equipment as the commentators. They certainly can use television monitors for starters. Where she is sitting, I can certainly see things that she could miss.

                    http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Manny+P...ey/Wu2n_PRUwCV

                    Comment

                    • BattleAxePurist
                      LayinTrapsSplittinSkulls
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 5376
                      • 90
                      • 47
                      • 11,853

                      #30
                      There should be a post fight judging system to grade them on their scorecards going back and reviewing wether they were close to what the result should of been of course there will always be subjective scores and rounds but you can ususally narrow it down and see who might be scoring from outer space and who is accurate and the highest graded judge gets the bigger fights and more fights.


                      Also maybe have 5-6 judges to get a wider pool to have as deciding factors

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP