Umm what is flawed logic? Please explain. My argument is that there is no proof that any of these so called "weight drained" fighters are at that much of a disadvantage that they would have made a difference regardless of weight. What evidence have you brought other than a few quotes that is just Roach's opinion? So he wants his fighter to have all the advantages. That just makes him a ****, does not make him correct.
Do you really believe that Cotto would have won if he weigh 1 or 2 extra pounds at the weigh in? Is this your honest opinion?
Do you really believe that Cotto would have won if he weigh 1 or 2 extra pounds at the weigh in? Is this your honest opinion?
Comment