James Kirkland's own interview about Canelo, LA Times

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ИATAS
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 36648
    • 2,509
    • 1,953
    • 50,835

    #1

    James Kirkland's own interview about Canelo, LA Times

    Everyone is just reading what Richard Schaefer is saying and some writers, listen to what Kirkland is saying. He's saying bluntly he's not 100% healthy coming off shoulder surgery, he's saying he's not going to fight Canelo going into a fight not 100%, unless he got some crazy amount of money like $2-$3 million dollars, basically saying he'd lose for that kind of money, but not 6 figures. He knows he's not going to get paid that kind of money and will plan a tune up fight later in the year.



    Weighing the pain he was feeling in his arthroscopically repaired right shoulder along with the magnitude of the bout being the increasingly popular Alvarez's first pay-per-view at MGM Grand in Las Vegas, and his pay, Kirkland said he decided Friday his shoulder won't allow him to fight Alvarez.

    "People expect Kirkland to give it his all, 100%," Kirkland told The Times in a telephone interview Friday afternoon. "If I fight Alvarez with one arm and lose, people will say, 'Kirkland's not as good as thought he was.' Well, I'd be fighting one-handed.

    "An injury is an injury. My health is my performance, and if I don't pay attention to my health, who's to say it won't happen again. I need to sit back and stay off it and make sure it's healed to the max."


    Kirkland (31-1, 27 knockouts) dismissed a report he was to earn as much as $3 million to fight Alvarez (40-0-1, 29 KOs), explaining instead he was expecting a purse worth "six figures -- the biggest money of my career -- but if that" $3 million, "was the case, I'd be fighting."

    [...]

    "Alvarez is the biggest name in boxing now behind Mayweather and Pacquiao," Kirkland said. "They all knew what a huge fight like this would bring," financially, "so if it means I'm jeopardizing my career to take it, pay me what I'm worth.

    "And don't look at this as if I'm ducking and dodging. Money's not going to make me jump the gun on this. I think 'Canelo' would want me at 100% for this fight. I love this sport, and want to show everyone again what a true warrior is."

    "I want to be sure I can win this fight," Kirkland said. "I've wanted this fight from the beginning. I took two eliminator fights to get it. They wanted to build him more. They did. He's a great fighter now. But I have to pay attention to my long term and not fight this fight with an arm and a half.


    Kirkland said he's like to return to the ring against a "mediocre" opponent around October, then get his shot at Alvarez sometime in 2013.


  • Kagami Taiga
    Generation of Miracles
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 19078
    • 703
    • 228
    • 40,183

    #2
    Originally posted by ИATAS206
    Everyone is just reading what Richard Schaefer is saying and some writers, listen to what Kirkland is saying. He's saying bluntly he's not 100% healthy coming off shoulder surgery, he's saying he's not going to fight Canelo going into a fight not 100%, unless he got some crazy amount of money like $2-$3 million dollars, basically saying he'd lose for that kind of money, but not 6 figures. He knows he's not going to get paid that kind of money and will plan a tune up fight later in the year.



    Weighing the pain he was feeling in his arthroscopically repaired right shoulder along with the magnitude of the bout being the increasingly popular Alvarez's first pay-per-view at MGM Grand in Las Vegas, and his pay, Kirkland said he decided Friday his shoulder won't allow him to fight Alvarez.

    "People expect Kirkland to give it his all, 100%," Kirkland told The Times in a telephone interview Friday afternoon. "If I fight Alvarez with one arm and lose, people will say, 'Kirkland's not as good as thought he was.' Well, I'd be fighting one-handed.

    "An injury is an injury. My health is my performance, and if I don't pay attention to my health, who's to say it won't happen again. I need to sit back and stay off it and make sure it's healed to the max."


    Kirkland (31-1, 27 knockouts) dismissed a report he was to earn as much as $3 million to fight Alvarez (40-0-1, 29 KOs), explaining instead he was expecting a purse worth "six figures -- the biggest money of my career -- but if that" $3 million, "was the case, I'd be fighting."

    [...]

    "Alvarez is the biggest name in boxing now behind Mayweather and Pacquiao," Kirkland said. "They all knew what a huge fight like this would bring," financially, "so if it means I'm jeopardizing my career to take it, pay me what I'm worth.

    "And don't look at this as if I'm ducking and dodging. Money's not going to make me jump the gun on this. I think 'Canelo' would want me at 100% for this fight. I love this sport, and want to show everyone again what a true warrior is."

    "I want to be sure I can win this fight," Kirkland said. "I've wanted this fight from the beginning. I took two eliminator fights to get it. They wanted to build him more. They did. He's a great fighter now. But I have to pay attention to my long term and not fight this fight with an arm and a half.


    Kirkland said he's like to return to the ring against a "mediocre" opponent around October, then get his shot at Alvarez sometime in 2013.


    http://www.latimes.com/sports/sports...,7427445.story
    I doubt he'll get a shot at Alvarez after this fiasco. IMO it's highly unlikely at this point.

    Comment

    • onechance87
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 12753
      • 244
      • 0
      • 20,080

      #3
      lost alot of respect for u kirkland.Ur making texas look bad vato.

      Comment

      • THE REED
        Sixty Forty
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 43481
        • 1,988
        • 1,483
        • 690,068,075

        #4
        All real talk, and I agree with him... Good for him, he didnt sell himself.

        Comment

        • onechance87
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 12753
          • 244
          • 0
          • 20,080

          #5
          Originally posted by THE REED™
          All real talk, and I agree with him... Good for him, he didnt sell himself.
          y im i not suprised.

          Comment

          • Atreyu Khalil
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2005
            • 3283
            • 72
            • 96
            • 3,679

            #6
            Originally posted by THE REED™
            All real talk, and I agree with him... Good for him, he didnt sell himself.
            whos lying? Richard or Him?

            Comment

            • .:: JSFD26 ::.
              Brawski
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2012
              • 33329
              • 725
              • 432
              • 44,762

              #7
              Of course he's gonna put out an interview like this TODAY after it all happened. And you still believe this?

              Comment

              • THE REED
                Sixty Forty
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 43481
                • 1,988
                • 1,483
                • 690,068,075

                #8
                Originally posted by Atreyu Khalil
                whos lying? Richard or Him?
                The promoter or the fighter?

                Comment

                • -PBP-
                  32 Time World Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 24107
                  • 836
                  • 635
                  • 34,297

                  #9
                  That's exactly what I was saying in the other thread.

                  He fights Canelo at 75% and loses, all of the sudden its "see told you Kirkland was garbage, stop making excuses if he wasn't 100% he shouldn't of taken the fight"

                  You see it in the every day talk on this forum:

                  "Mike Jones sucks, he lost to Jesus Soto Karass"

                  "Laras garbage, he lost to Molina"

                  "Paul Williams doesn't deserve this fight. He's shop worn. He lost to Lara"

                  "Cotto is shot. He took bestings from Pac and Margarito"

                  Why would he risk going into this fight less than 100%?

                  Comment

                  • THE REED
                    Sixty Forty
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 43481
                    • 1,988
                    • 1,483
                    • 690,068,075

                    #10
                    Originally posted by onechance87
                    y im i not suprised.
                    Why would I care what you think again? Remind me because I dont remember.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP