People who don't like Pacquiao thinks he is overrated.
People who loves Pacquiao thinks he is one of the best.
I think that just leave it be...let the world argue by itself. In my humble opinion, to be OVER-RATED he must first be RATED. Some fighters are not even RATED, so at least that's got to count on something. hehe.
I am neutral on this one...simply put he has accomplished many things that many boxers would be envious to be in his position.
In this day and age of media hype, social media, internet and the speed of information going back and forth in a blink of an eye, I would say ALL BOXERS in this era are overrated to promote fights.
But if we backtrack on this overused and abused term in "overrated", I think that he did accomplish a lot of things magnificently. So why not just leave it be? Let it be...the fact that we're all talking about it meant he is there somewhere. No one ever goes to the ring winning 50+ fights without getting their due credits.
I don't care, any fighter going 50+ wins and win the way he did will ever live up to the expectations of all fans. There will be "haters" and there will be "fans" and most of us here are mere posters who like to argue and are armchair boxing historians.
It's ok to be a fan or not to be a fan. One thing we can't discredit - Pacquiao is one memorable fighter in our era, just like the big names with Mayweather, JMM, DLH...
People who loves Pacquiao thinks he is one of the best.
I think that just leave it be...let the world argue by itself. In my humble opinion, to be OVER-RATED he must first be RATED. Some fighters are not even RATED, so at least that's got to count on something. hehe.
I am neutral on this one...simply put he has accomplished many things that many boxers would be envious to be in his position.
In this day and age of media hype, social media, internet and the speed of information going back and forth in a blink of an eye, I would say ALL BOXERS in this era are overrated to promote fights.
But if we backtrack on this overused and abused term in "overrated", I think that he did accomplish a lot of things magnificently. So why not just leave it be? Let it be...the fact that we're all talking about it meant he is there somewhere. No one ever goes to the ring winning 50+ fights without getting their due credits.
I don't care, any fighter going 50+ wins and win the way he did will ever live up to the expectations of all fans. There will be "haters" and there will be "fans" and most of us here are mere posters who like to argue and are armchair boxing historians.
It's ok to be a fan or not to be a fan. One thing we can't discredit - Pacquiao is one memorable fighter in our era, just like the big names with Mayweather, JMM, DLH...
Comment