Carl Froch - Top 10 P4P ?

[Kagami Taiga]

there are many ppl who froch would have an argument of being over p4p wise.

[HitmanHattonAY]

there are many ppl who froch would have an argument of being over p4p wise.

agree mate, i think he's top 10 worthy

[puga]

there are many ppl who froch would have an argument of being over p4p wise.

like who?....

[HitmanHattonAY]

the klitchkos can't be in the top 10 for fighting Mormeck, Tony Thompson

[puga]

the klitchkos can't be in the top 10 for fighting Mormeck, Tony Thompson

you crazy...the most dominant fighters in their divison for years yet they dont deserved to be in the p4p? if anything, both should be higher in the p4p rankings...

[New England]

he's pretty close.


nobody has fought better comp over he last few years.

that said, he lost lopsided to ward
lost close to kessler
and won razor thin over dirrell

the guys he sonned were good fighters (taylor, abraham, johnson, pascal,) but they're really nothing to write home about standing alone.


since '08 nobody has fought better competition.

[HitmanHattonAY]

you crazy...the most dominant fighters in their divison for years yet they dont deserved to be in the p4p? if anything, both should be higher in the p4p rankings...

Carl Froch could have fought bums for 5 years and have 12 title defenses under his belt but he fights the best fight after fight.

Its not the Klitckohs fault that they haven't had the opponents to fight but they shouldn't be top 10 for fighting bums.

[Oh you out son]

how many fighters have fought the level of opponents in the time space Froch has ?

p4p is not so much about resume or quality of opponents. if it was then froch should definitely be in. but froch doesn't look very good against really good boxers. dirrell (even though he is a whiny *****) and ward especially made him look pretty bad and super slow.

but if he fights guys who like to brawl at times (pascal/abraham) or guys who can't take his pressure (bute/taylor) he can look like a machine.

i would be happy for him if he gets on the p4p list though and it wouldn't be bad to put him at like 9 or 10th i don't think, he does deserve it.

[HitmanHattonAY]

p4p is not so much about resume or quality of opponents. if it was then froch should definitely be in. but froch doesn't look very good against really good boxers. dirrell (even though he is a whiny *****) and ward especially made him look pretty bad and super slow.

but if he fights guys who like to brawl at times (pascal/abraham) or guys who can't take his pressure (bute/taylor) he can look like a machine.

i would be happy for him if he gets on the p4p list though and it wouldn't be bad to put him at like 9 or 10th i don't think, he does deserve it.

i agree that he might not be the best technically and your right about 9/10th in p4p list

[Oh you out son]

i think this would be my p4p list if i include Froch, if not Froch i would prolly have Dawson

1. Mayweather
2. Pacquiao
3. Ward
4. Martinez
5. Wlad K
6. Vitali K
7. Marquez
8. Bradley
9. Donaire
10. Froch