Comments Thread For: Juan Manuel Marquez Lays Down Terms For Pacquiao Bout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • maguirre
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 7037
    • 543
    • 196
    • 11,164

    #51
    I don't rely on people's opinions when it comes to boxing. It's not rocket science. You can't win by fighting backwards. It's impossible. You can draw, but you can't win. All you have to do is re watch the fight and see for yourselves.

    Comment

    • Reloaded
      Truth Teller
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 17097
      • 750
      • 16
      • 26,393

      #52
      Originally posted by Cgarcia
      I don't rely on people's opinions when it comes to boxing. It's not rocket science. You can't win by fighting backwards. It's impossible. You can draw, but you can't win. All you have to do is re watch the fight and see for yourselves.
      Your an idiot and dont know the first thing about this sport you best not follow your opinion because its terribly flawed , lots of fighters win going backwards Leornard could KO you on the back foot , boxing is about connect more than your opponent does regardless of what way your moving .

      Comment

      • budfr
        Stick N Move 2 Slick
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 4252
        • 323
        • 155
        • 20,869

        #53
        Pacman is a sinner!!! He tries to act all Christian but he lied by saying he defeated JMM in their last bout.

        Comment

        • Primera
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2012
          • 1837
          • 128
          • 93
          • 2,330

          #54
          Originally posted by budfr
          Pacman is a sinner!!! He tries to act all Christian but he lied by saying he defeated JMM in their last bout.
          he even said to his fans "be a real filipino, i won the fight if you think I lost you have no filipino blood in you"

          Comment

          • maguirre
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 7037
            • 543
            • 196
            • 11,164

            #55
            Originally posted by Reloaded
            Your an idiot and dont know the first thing about this sport you best not follow your opinion because its terribly flawed , lots of fighters win going backwards Leornard could KO you on the back foot , boxing is about connect more than your opponent does regardless of what way your moving .
            Marquez didn't win that fight. See it for yourselves. It's not rocket science. Least you can say it's a draw. I can agree to that. **** those who say he won when he clearly didn't. Lederman, three judges and compubox scored it to Pac. Lederman will school you about boxing, brah.

            Comment

            • EL_cano
              Welterweight Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 1256
              • 29
              • 32
              • 13,842

              #56
              Originally posted by Cgarcia
              You can't outfight your opponent by fighting backwards. It's impossible. You gotta be an idiot to believe Marquez won especially when his only goal is to survive and not to win. You can draw, but you can never win by fighting backwards. It's scientifically and physically impossible. That's why three judges, Lederman, compubox scored it to Pacman. Watch the replay homeys. Don't take my word for it. Hehe...
              In a 10-point system, the boxer* who wins a round is given 10 points, and the other *boxer gets nine points. (10 -9)
              If there was a * knockdown in the round (10-8)
              2 knock downs (10-7)
              If a* judge can’t decide who won the round, it is* scored 10-10.
              Now if you are the challenger, you must be* the aggressor (Pacquiao vs Cotto) in very close* rounds the* Champion gets the 10. For example if* Pacquiao would just stay still and Marquez does not* attack, Pacquiao gets the 10 and Marquez 9. In this* case Manny (champion) was always aggressive while* Marquez (challenger) waits for an attack and* counters.
              Marquez’s body language fooled a lot of* people. Making people feel that he was the winner or* at least it was a draw. It may look like he was* landing more punches but the tricky part here is he* was on the defensive, luring Pacquiao into his *tactical traps (remember the challenger must be the one* who is aggressive to be awarded 10 ). So even if *Marquez did connect more punches, he gets only 9 for * being defensive and Manny gets the 10 for being the *attacker.
              Pacquiao got more “10″s than *Marquez. Manny wins.

              Comment

              • Primera
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 1837
                • 128
                • 93
                • 2,330

                #57
                Originally posted by Cgarcia
                Marquez didn't win that fight. See it for yourselves. It's not rocket science. Least you can say it's a draw. I can agree to that. **** those who say he won when he clearly didn't. Lederman, three judges and compubox scored it to Pac. Lederman will school you about boxing, brah.
                percentage wise, JMM beat Pac in compubox

                Comment

                • .:: JSFD26 ::.
                  Brawski
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 33329
                  • 725
                  • 432
                  • 44,762

                  #58
                  Why does Marquez and others keep crying about him getting robbed? Close fights? Yes. Could he had won one of those? Yes. Did he win their third meeting? No. Why? He let off the gas last 2 rounds. Blame yourself and your corner for it.

                  Comment

                  • RightStraight
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 331
                    • 13
                    • 3
                    • 6,454

                    #59
                    I'm losing respect each time he mentions Pacquiao. I get that Pacquiao STOLE the spotlight but Marquez is defined by those 3 fights. At the end of the day, he needs to let it go. You had 3 fights, everyone says you were robbed. What more do you want?

                    He just needs to fight Morales already.

                    Comment

                    • El Mini 6
                      Banned
                      • Jan 2012
                      • 113
                      • 28
                      • 0
                      • 279

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Hi-Dro
                      And lmao at all these ****** ass di...kkkk riding Pac fans who are mad that their God got exposed by Marquez, as being a cherrypicking, deceiving, and fake hoe. Ya'll make me laugh up in hurrrrr. **** out of hurrr with the fake as.s boxing knowledge you guys claim to have.

                      Exactly Bunch of *******s up In Here, They Dont know **** about Boxing, Straight up , Their "Humble Christian Noble Congressman " Got Exposed Once Again and Marquez and as far as im Concerned Pac Hasn't beat Marquez,In my book, The Hate Marquez gets on this Website is just Amazing, No respect whatsoever. One Dimensional Catchweight King Hypejob, He Needs to Learn Boxing 101 , Too Afraid to leave his Master Arum Because he knows he Protects the **** outta him . Too Bad going backwards and outboxing your opponent according to these Pac ******s is not winning a fight and Rely on Compubox lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP