Originally posted by IronDanHamza
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
IMO, Froch is a greater fighter than Calzaghe.
Collapse
-
-
If Froch beats Kessler in the rematch, then yes, I would have to put Froch past Calzaghe resume wise. Head to head though, I still have Calzaghe winning 9 times out of 10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Check View PostSo Froch would need to beat Ward and Dawson to be greater than Calzaghe? If Froch did that he would probably be the greatest fighter from the whole U.K! Lets not get carried away, Zags resume isn't nearly that good. Especially if you think Froch needs to beat 2 top 10 p4pers, from 2 different weight classes.
I don't care if Calzaghe was the man at 168 or if you believe he was the man at 175. Those two weight classes were both rather weak at that time. Now those two divisions are arguably top 5 divisions in the sport.
I don't mean to attack your post but that is the exact point I was making with people from the UK love Calzaghe. You want him to go through the Super Six, Pascal, fight Kessler again, Bute, and now beat Ward in a rematch and then move up and beat the king of that division(mind you he already beat the previous king). All that, while Calzaghe did so very little.
All because Calzaghe had a few belts.
Originally posted by el*** View PostCalzaghe openly ducked pre prime Froch to fight 40 year olds!
And you think Calzaghe would get within a one mile radius of prime Froch?? LOL
Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View PostNot at all.
Calzaghe never fought anyone as good as Ward and turned down a fight with Dawson. Carl could call out ancient Roy Jones and win no problem, tie one of Calzaghe's 'best' wins without breaking sweat.
Calzaghe was already on his way out when Dawson was on the rise.
Comment
-
I have more respect for Froch then I ever did Calzaghe that is for sure
simply because Froch can say he fought the best of the best during his ERA and ducked no one, he could have stayed in Nottingham and protect his undefeated record as well if he wanted to do so
Comment
-
Originally posted by KnockUTheFukOut View PostI have more respect for Froch then I ever did Calzaghe that is for sure
simply because Froch can say he fought the best of the best during his ERA and ducked no one, he could have stayed in Nottingham and protect his undefeated record as well if he wanted to do so
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostYeah, that's why I wish Calzaghe was a few years younger. Maybe he isn't looking to retire until right now, and he could have fought Froch now or before now. Maybe in the Super Six.
That would have been a huge fight in 2012 if they were both around.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Check View PostI've felt like this for a long time and stated many times on this very site that the Cobra is the man. I don't know why there is a love infatuation with Joe Calzaghe but there clearly is for people across the pond. I think it has a lot to do with him being undefeated and cruising through his competition but that just needs to stop.
I respect Calzaghe a bit because it isn't easy to do what he did but his resume pales in comparison to Frochs. Yes, Calzaghe is undefeated, cong**** but being undefeated means very little to me. I care about who you fought and when you fought them. The Cobra is beating guys that are at the top of their game and never been in a boring fight. I don't care if Froch got schooled by Ward because there wasn't a Ward skill level fight ever on Calzaghes resume.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichCCFC View PostHopkins was as good as Ward..not anymore
Calzaghe was already on his way out when Dawson was on the rise.
Calzaghe retired at what, 36? Froch is nearing that and still talking about fights with Kessler, moving up to rematch Pascal and other top LH's over the next few years. Kessler and Hopkins saved Joe's legacy looking at it.
Manfredo, Bika, Lacy, Ashira, Velt, Salem, Mkrtchyan, Mitchell, Pudwill, Jiminez, Brewer, Mcintyre, Velt - that's 13 of Calzaghe's last 16 career fights, compare those names to who Froch challenged himself against.
Comment
Comment