Joel Diaz:Beating Pacquiao and coming out the ring without a win the biggest fear

[Lineal Champ]

Joel Diaz, "Beating Manny Pacquiao and coming out the ring without a win the biggest fear, and it is not Manny Pacquiao. It is the judges decision."

I was watching an interview he did with a filipino news reporter and thats what he said. Discuss

[slackblick]

Joel Diaz, "Beating Manny Pacquiao and coming out the ring without a win the biggest fear, and it is not Manny Pacquiao. It is the judges decision."

I was watching an interview he did with a filipino news reporter and thats what he said. Discuss

bradley will not....i repeat will not win this fight.

[americanbot]

pac just won a robbery in his very last fight...........the guy in no way deserved that last win.

it's a valid complaint.

[Primera]

yup, everyone knows that pacquiao is not only protected by Bob Arum and Top Rank, but the judges too.

[straightleft]

pac just won a robbery in his very last fight...........the guy in no way deserved that last win.

it's a valid complaint.

For Bradley to win and get the judges decision he must fight like a challenger and bring the fight to the champion. Marquez will never get a decision against Pac if the fight is too close because he fights like he is the champion and he thinks Pac is the challenger. LOL @ the robbery comment. People talking about robbery when the fight is too close need to be checked their head.

[Hougigo]

hit me up with a link dude

[Khalid X]

Morales beat Manny via a decision, because he fought like a man and didn't fight like a coward.

If those judges are biased, please explain why Dave Morretti gave Morales the nod in his first fight with Pacquiao, yet gave the nod to Manny over Marquez in their third fight?

If he is biased towards Manny, wouldn't he have scored the fight in favor of Pacquiao to help him rob El terrible in their first fight?


BTW what bum is Marquez is facing next?

I like how he and his fans live off of having close fight with Pacquiao..lol

[hugh grant]

pac just won a robbery in his very last fight...........the guy in no way deserved that last win.

it's a valid complaint.

JMM knows he wasnt robbed, and knows that Pac won the fight. The evidence being JMM wants to fight Pac again to have another attempt to beat him at least once.
If he knew the judges would rob him, he wouldnt want to fight pac.

[Primera]

JMM knows he wasnt robbed, and knows that Pac won the fight. The evidence being JMM wants to fight Pac again to have another attempt to beat him at least once.
If he knew the judges would rob him, he wouldnt want to fight pac.

wasn't it bob arum that immediately called for a rematch?

oh and let's not forget marquez celebrating while pacquiao wobbled over to his corner to pray for a robbery

[Johnwoo8686]

Morales beat Manny via a decision, because he fought like a man and didn't fight like a coward.

If those judges are biased, please explain why Dave Morretti gave Morales the nod in his first fight with Pacquiao, yet gave the nod to Manny over Marquez in their third fight?

If he is biased towards Manny, wouldn't he have scored the fight in favor of Pacquiao to help him rob El terrible in their first fight?


BTW what bum is Marquez is facing next?

I like how he and his fans live off of having close fight with Pacquiao..lol

Thats a ****** comparison. The judge gave Morales the decision in the first fight because 1. Morales dominated Pacquiao pretty easily and 2. Manny Pacquiao wasn't the global superstar he is today. I'm sure that judge had Manny goggles and was only focused on what Manny was doing and not what Marquez was doing. Face it, most people thought Manny lost that fight. He was booed out the arena and most polls had Marquez winning.