Joel Diaz:Beating Pacquiao and coming out the ring without a win the biggest fear

[Primera]

even the HBO poll had 90% Marquez won votes and they had to delete it and remake it

and pac good booed out of the majority pinoy crowd

[The_Sandman]

The fact that Bob Arum said "It's just business" to Marquez at the post fight press conference tells me that it is very possible for Bradley to get robbed. And it also tells me that Arum himself knows who won that fight between Pacquiao and Marquez. And it also tells me that Arum had a lot to do with the judges decision.

[Bushbaby]

Obviously a legitimate claim.

[mrgreenfingers]

For Bradley to win and get the judges decision he must fight like a challenger and bring the fight to the champion. Marquez will never get a decision against Pac if the fight is too close because he fights like he is the champion and he thinks Pac is the challenger. LOL @ the robbery comment. People talking about robbery when the fight is too close need to be checked their head.

it was voted robbery of the year....

[SpeedKillz]

very very legit claim. lol at the idiots that dont think pac got the biggest gift of his career against marquez. everyone knows whats going happen, its no secret that unless tim KOs pac, hes leavin the ring a loser, regardless of how much he takes manny to school...

[MindBat]

wasn't it bob arum that immediately called for a rematch?

oh and let's not forget marquez celebrating while pacquiao wobbled over to his corner to pray for a robbery

"Dear Lord if you can hear me now, please let the judges realize that we paid them extra for a reason. Thank you. Amen."

[Ray*]

Why would bradley get a decision? I dont get it, No one is getting a decision against Pac or Mayweather, Not especially when the judges are Ford and Moretti, roth etc

[Ray*]

"Dear Lord if you can hear me now, please let the judges realize that we paid them extra for a reason. Thank you. Arum."

Fixed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[straightleft]

it was voted robbery of the year....

You badly need him. You are welcome.

http://www.mdshrink.com/

[Khalid X]

Thats a ****** comparison. The judge gave Morales the decision in the first fight because 1. Morales dominated Pacquiao pretty easily and 2. Manny Pacquiao wasn't the global superstar he is today. I'm sure that judge had Manny goggles and was only focused on what Manny was doing and not what Marquez was doing. Face it, most people thought Manny lost that fight. He was booed out the arena and most polls had Marquez winning.

stop it.

Manny had the whole mexicutioner moniker going and was one of the most popular boxers in the sport at that time. While 350-450k ppv isn't a lot compared to the numbers he does today, that is still better than anyone in the history of those divisions was able to pull and the fact that he was started to do those on a regular basis, when no fighter today, outside of him and floyd can do better than those numbers on a consistent basis, it made more sense for judges to rob his opponents then, than it does now.

And about the booing, Floyd was booed harder and had more **** throw at him when he fought Marquez than Pac.

That's a fact and I dare you to try and refute that. Does that mean Marquez won that fight.....absolutely not as he was dominated to the point of embarrassment by Floyd.

All that means is Marquez fans are just as delusional in real life than they are on this website.